Re: [cgiwrap-users] Re: Talk of heresy and CGIWRAP
Brought to you by:
nneul
From: Tuc <tt...@tt...> - 2000-08-18 14:02:14
|
> > Remind me again why you want to have more tight integration with > Apache? You'd like to make the CGIWrap'd scripts faster with script > caching via FastCGI? > You are CORRECT! (Well...Symantics.... It started out as I was using FastCGI for a project, and needed to do the things CGIWrap does, but suexec fell short. FastCGI does allow swapping out the suexec program, but cgiwrap doesn't accept the same parameter list that suexec does) Tuc/TTSG > On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Ralph Huntington wrote: > > > > Right, but if we could integrate it closer with Apache and > > > other tools (Like FastCGI) that can make use of it, we are doing THAT > > > much better. I think it would help all the configuration problems people > > > have, just saying "Hey, configure with SUEXEC, copy over su-cgiwrap, and > > > go for it". > > > > Well, you *do* have a point there. Perhaps mod_cgiwrap ??? -=r=- > > |