Re: [Celestia-developers] Re: Saturn texture
Real-time 3D visualization of space
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
cjlaurel
From: Fridger S. <fri...@de...> - 2004-07-23 19:59:16
|
Grant, Selden, Pat,..., Preface;-) --------- -- Yes I do work with 32bit color on my Laptop -- I presume that neither Grant, nor me, nor Bjorn Jonsson presently know for sure the (precise) colors of Saturn, in the southern hemisphere to be specific. -- While I used to be a devoted HST-color believer, my trust has weakened considerably since the HST-"truecolor" Mars has changed color so dramatically. See my long thread in the forum some time ago! -- Like Bjorn Jonsson, I have observed Saturn for decades with an 8" telescope that is virtually free of any color aberrations. Proposition: ------------ -- As a starter, I have compared the HST-Heritage Saturn photo with the default Saturn of Celestia, using the default solarsys.ssc here: http://www.shatters.net/~t00fri/images/sat-comp.jpg We can see quite a few marked differences! a) The darkness (high transparency) of Saturn's A-ring (bottom) which was most carefully reconstructed by Grant from earthbound data and which matches the recent Cassini imaging very well, is in /marked disagreement/ with this "highly praised" HST-Heritage "truecolor" photo (top)! So why should I believe the rest of the HST image?? b) Despite Grant's previous claims, the wide "sulfur yellow" band centered around the equator in the HST-photo is NOT identical to its default appearance in Celestia. In case, you cannot see that difference with your naked eyes, I have carefully measured and compared the central portion of that band with Photoshop. Using the preferrable CMYK color model, the yellow band is 0-2% C, 0-2% M, 15% Y, 0% K for HsT while the Celestia image gives 19% C 17% M 32% Y, 0%K! The virtually /clean/ Y color visible from HST, I definitely confirm in my countless telescope observations! In short, I can live with the yellow HST band but find the Celestia band inadequate. Even though Bjorn Jonsson gives an "impressive & brilliant explanation" for his work...Again, my preference would be to use a clean photo reference (either HST or Cassini) rather than this amazing blend of BJ, involving Viking 1,2, HST, & his telescope... [ c) Just as a non-serious aside: the recent title photo of S&T does NOT show BJ's but OF COURSE Cassini's Saturn...] -- Now (finally) I come to what I would have done already, if I had access to my usual image maipulation equipment and good Internet connection: I would use the R,G,B Saturn close-ups from the Cassini raw-data archive and compose them into a color image with the following /two/ constraints that largely fix the relative normalization of the three grayscale textures: i) The marked HST yellow equatorial band is to be reproduced precisely. ii) The darkness of the HST equatorial band is to be reproduced precisely. Then I would inspect the resulting colors in the southern hemisphere!! Pidgeon-gray-blue (HST) or yellow-orange (Cassini)?? That's the question... -- Last not least, I agree with Grant that we should try to optimize haze colors etc in Celestia first! Bye Fridger Grant Hutchison wrote: >>Unfortunately, on my systems (at work and at home), Celestia's lores >>and medres texture images seem to me to be quite desaturated. >>For example, Saturn looks almost white in the recent screencapture >>I made of Saturn's ring shadows. See >>http://www.lns.cornell.edu/~seb/celestia/gallery-001.html#5 >>and compare the two adjcent pictures. (I'll agree that the one >>on the right, using an older surface texture, is much too orange.) >> >> >This certainly matches my Celestia view - unfortunately in your view Titan >is blocking the central, yellowest part of the equatorial band, and allowing >us to see only the marginal areas most strongly influenced by Celestia's >blue haze - which to my mind has now been distinctly overcooked in an effort >to match the colour-enhanced Cassini images. The result is that yellows and >browns are markedly desaturated towards the planet's limb when viewed in >Celestia. >[Shrug.] So I'm saying it's a good texture and a bad haze. > >Grant > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop >FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! >Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Celestia-developers mailing list >Cel...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/celestia-developers > > |