From: Jon P. <jo...@cr...> - 2006-04-26 20:07:33
|
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:46 -0700, Mike Linksvayer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:33 -0700, Victor Stone wrote: > > um, well, I'm just relaying some pretty strong feelings from the folks > > who sponsor this project about the reason it exists: to spread and > > promote Creative Commons content which I can totally respect - it's > > why we don't ship with an 'all rights reserved' or 'public domain' > > license. If the purpose of ccHost has changed I can respect that too > > but it means a fundamental shift in priorities. > > Sorry for adding irrelevancy, but 'public domain' is fully supported by > Creative Commons. We have the PD dedication > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ and PD content can be > incorporated into any CC licensed work. > > PD probably should be included in ccHost as there's lots of PD content > out there suitable for remixing and CC supports it. Totally cchost supports this currently...its used by Open Clip Art Library. > ... > > I haven't followed this discussion closely but it seems that restricting > who can participate in a given community is orthogonal to licensing. If > someone wants to add a hack that restricts registrations to .edu > addresses, fine, but I don't see any place for that in the mainline > code. As I think Victor said there's an events mechanism that would > allow a site to cleanly add that hack locally. totally...would just be good to document this on the wiki if anyone undertakes this: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/cchost Jon -- Jon Phillips jo...@cr... cell: 510.499.0894 Software Engineer Creative Commons www.creativecommons.org |