From: Nafees B. Z. <bin...@mu...> - 2000-10-17 23:38:23
|
I think if the move to java is made, there ought to be a code fork.... I really don't think it'll happen though :) -n Kenneth Gordon wrote: > fo...@vi... wrote: > > > Jeremiah Moss wrote: > > > > > > > Excellent idea, now all we have to do is to convince everybody to > > > > get > > > > > a Java3D interpeter, and all of the developers to get a Java > > > > > compiler. > > > > > > > > not hard > > > > > > Convincing the general public, or convincing the programmers? > > > > Most windows machine have a Java Runtime Environment. Otherwise, we > > could point to the download pages. As for the programmers, well... > > The JRE isn't the problem. Java3D is not a part of the base JRE and needs > to be downloaded separately. So even with the newest JRE, everyone would > still need to download the Java3D extensions. Anyone know if we could > package the Java3D jar files with the application??? > > One other potential problem with going to Java3D is its performance on > SGI's is horrible! We did some benchmarks a while back, and our O2's > scored the lowest of any machine. Our ONYX2 was only marginally better > than some PC's for Java3D!! Until SGI puts in some effort to correct this > problem, I'm not sure you'll get satisfactory performance on an SGI. Then > again, it's possible that our machine is screwed up. Anyone else try out > J3D on an SGI? > > _______________________________________________ > BZFlag-dev mailing list > BZF...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/bzflag-dev |