|
From: Mark S. <ms...@um...> - 2012-04-03 15:15:15
|
Hello,
Thank you for your help.
I do not seem to be receiving reply messages from the list. I
didn't subscribe, but expected at least to see Patrik's reply in
my inbox instead of having to go to the web archive to read it.
Second, running "autoreconf -fiv" creates a "configure" file, but
returns the following errors (on both RHEL 5.4 and Fedora 16):
$ autoreconf -fiv
autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal --force -I m4
configure.ac:84: warning: macro `AM_DISABLE_SHARED' not found in
library
autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool
autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force
configure.ac:84: error: possibly undefined macro:
AM_DISABLE_SHARED
If this token and others are legitimate, please use
m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
configure.ac:85: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
And then running "./configure" gives:
$ ./configure
configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool
in config "."/config
This is using automake-1.11.1-5.fc14.noarch,
autoconf-2.68-2.fc15.noarch, and libtool-ltdl-2.4-9.fc16.x86_64
on the F16 machine,
and automake-1.9.6-2.3.el5, autoconf-2.59-12, and
libtool-ltdl-1.5.22-6.1 on RHEL 5.4.
Mark
----------------------------
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Mark Stock <mstock@...> wrote:
> Hello, returning Blitz++ user here (haven't played with it in 8+
> years) with a few questions:
>
> 1) Are there both CVS and mercurial repositories? I found mention
> of both in the blitz-support e-mail archive, and want to know
> which I should use.
Yeah, this is unfortunately confusing, but the current repo is the
mercurial one.
>
> 2) I downloaded BLitz++ using the following command
>
> hg clone http://blitz.hg.sourceforge.net:8000/hgroot/blitz/blitz
>
> and the "configure" file seems to be missing. I'm not sure
> where to go from here.
Configure is a generated file, so it's not in the repo. Do
"autoreconf -fiv" to get it.
> 3) When I build the v0.9 package (with ./configure and make
> lib) I don't get a lib/libblitz.a, just a lib/libblitz.la. The
> .a was in the lib/.libs/ directory. Why wasn't it created as
> part of the build?
The 0.9 is so old I can't say, but the .la is typically a libtool
file. In these cases, you can usually find the actual library
under .libs or something similar. But don't use 0.9, it's too
old.
|