Re: [Bibdesk-users] Problem with Smart Folder: missing date-added are included

[Luc B. <luc...@ma...>]

I am on MacOS Big Sur if it makes any difference. Soon to upgrade to Monterey…

> On 18 Sep 2024, at 02:49, Luc Bourhis <luc...@ma...> wrote:
> 
> Here is a screen capture.
> 
> <Screenshot 2024-09-18 at 02.48.31.png>
> 
>> On 17 Sep 2024, at 16:16, Christiaan Hofman <cmh...@gm... <mailto:cmh...@gm...>> wrote:
>> 
>> Are you sure you are talking about the date-added? There has not changed anything for many years for this, the filters work just the same as they have done since 2006.
>> 
>> There was a bug fix in 1.9.4 with the modified-date, where we erroneously compared the date-added instead for some functions. Perhaps this is what you are thinking of?
>> 
>> Apart from that, I don’t see what you describe. What kind of condition do you use? When I use a condition with a date range, I see that a missing date-added is not included in the smart group. What I see is that a start date is always considered true, and an end date is always false when a date-added is missing. Tris has always been the case. Perhaps this logic may not be the best though.
>> 
>> Christiaan
>> 
>>> On 17 Sep 2024, at 13:09, Luc Bourhis via Bibdesk-users <bib...@li... <mailto:bib...@li...>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I use Smart Folders with different ranges of date-added. It used to work fine but I have just noticed that Bibdesk 1.9.5 treats missing date-added as matching ones. This might have started in earlier versions: I did not pay attention. By “missing”, I mean that the column “Added” in the central list display has an empty entry.
>>> 
>>> Best wishes,
>>> 
>>> Luc J Bourhis
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bibdesk-users mailing list
>> Bib...@li... <mailto:Bib...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
>