|
From: Luc B. <luc...@ma...> - 2024-09-18 00:49:50
|
Here is a screen capture. > On 17 Sep 2024, at 16:16, Christiaan Hofman <cmh...@gm...> wrote: > > Are you sure you are talking about the date-added? There has not changed anything for many years for this, the filters work just the same as they have done since 2006. > > There was a bug fix in 1.9.4 with the modified-date, where we erroneously compared the date-added instead for some functions. Perhaps this is what you are thinking of? > > Apart from that, I don’t see what you describe. What kind of condition do you use? When I use a condition with a date range, I see that a missing date-added is not included in the smart group. What I see is that a start date is always considered true, and an end date is always false when a date-added is missing. Tris has always been the case. Perhaps this logic may not be the best though. > > Christiaan > >> On 17 Sep 2024, at 13:09, Luc Bourhis via Bibdesk-users <bib...@li...> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I use Smart Folders with different ranges of date-added. It used to work fine but I have just noticed that Bibdesk 1.9.5 treats missing date-added as matching ones. This might have started in earlier versions: I did not pay attention. By “missing”, I mean that the column “Added” in the central list display has an empty entry. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Luc J Bourhis > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bibdesk-users mailing list > Bib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users |