From: Adam R. M. <ama...@ma...> - 2006-12-24 16:29:59
|
On Dec 24, 2006, at 02:13, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > It seems you Replaced the BibDocument.h in the nib instead of Merge. > Never Replace a multi-file API! oops...that's what happens late at night after a long day ;). Thanks for fixing it. > For the UI we could perhaps plug in a view like the search view. > Although it seems also appropriate to use the main tableview for the > search results and the preview pane could also be useful. I think I > prefer the searchfield at the top. So perhaps we could also combine > the tableview and the searchfield in the upper pane. Yeah, the main table has all the stuff we need for displaying BibItems. I originally thought of some separate window or duplicating the search view, but that seems like a waste. I wanted to combine the tableview and searchfield (the view adjustment code was intended for this); I forgot what addSubview: would do with a splitview, though (and then didn't have time to change it). > Do we want to save the PubMed group? Maybe we should have a separate > group category for it. Also, should we have more than one pubmed > search groups? Perhaps we should just have a toggle. Are there more > of this kind of searches we can add (eg citeseer and other OAI > compliant sites)? This is an open question, for sure. I originally intended to have just one temporary search group per document, but I think it's useful to have multiple searches active. One advantage of saving the group is that you can refresh a search periodically and see updates...but it really isn't that much work to type it in again. I think there are other sites that we could use this idea with, so perhaps a separate group category is appropriate. In that case, we might want a more generic "Search Website" action that brings up a popup with the sites? Adam |