|
From: Chris G. <cgg...@gm...> - 2007-08-24 20:05:32
|
On Aug 24, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > The reason is very simple: I don't have Category as a default field, > so on my side this field is ignored for comparison for equivalence, > while with your settings the category field is compared because it is > a default field. As I mentioned in an earlier mail, BibDesk compares > required, optional *and* default fields to determine equivalence. > > If you don't want the Category field to be taken into account you > should not include it as a default field. You can still add the > Category field or set it by adding it to a field group by drag&drop. > You can also temporarily disable the default status when merging. Okay, what about fields like Local-Url, which is greyed-out in the preferences? Does that mean that two other-wise identical records with different local urls will always be judged as non-duplicates? If so, is there an alternative to manual scanning for identifying such records? I guess "Select Duplicates by Cite Key"? Chris |