Re: [Bibdesk-develop] Bibdesk version and OSX version (was URL from metadata?)

[Christiaan H. <chr...@we...>]

On May 2, 2005, at 11:20, Michael McCracken wrote:

> Are you suggesting this for 1.0? If so, we need to figure out how we 
> want to conditionally compile for 10.4 like we are doing now for 
> 10.2,3...
>
Is the URL meta data code only 10.4?

> That's an interesting question - should we include 10.4 features in 
> the 1.x release or keep that definitely only 10.3+?
>
> The recent posts I've seen about it costing ~$500 to keep up with OS X 
> since 10.0 have me thinking we may need to keep a 10.3 version around 
> for a while.
>
you mean the 1.0, or the new BD post 1.0?

> -mike
>

I think it is better to keep BD 1.0 10.2+webkit compatible, and not add 
10.4 features to it. And didn't we have a feature freeze ;-)

Moreover, lets keep BD 1.0 basically as it is now. Also because of 
localization, which could be started soon (after the help is finished).

Christiaan