Re: [AVaRICE-user] avarice and can128

[Theodore A. R. <tr...@op...>]

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Brian Dean wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:52:07PM -0800, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
>
> > So I guess there's still that libiberty issue on OSX and Cygwin...
>
> At least on OSX, avarice linked fine against libiberty as installed by
> gcc, so I did not run into any problems in that regard.  Was that the
> expected behaviour?  I did not explicitly install libiberty from
> binutils, only libbfd which was required for avarice.

When building binutils and gcc from the tarballs, libiberty.a gets
installed by both builds. There is no way that I found to stop this from
happening (I beat me head against the wall for a few hours trying to
figure how to do it with no success).

It appears that the --enable-install-libiberty does do much. :-(

The problem is API skew between the libiberty in binutils and that in
gcc.

---
Ted Roth
PGP Key ID: 0x18F846E9
Jabber ID: tr...@ja...