Re: [Audacity-quality] Sync-lock-look
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2010-09-14 01:23:57
|
| From Steve the Fiddle <ste...@gm...> | Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:15:11 +0100 | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Sync-lock-look > The link icon on track panel is clearly not a button now (which is > good), and I like that you can click on it to select the track when > the track is collapsed. I'm fine with it now the horizontal line above the icon has gone. > However when SyncLock is off and the track is minimised, there is > a tiny sliver between the track name and the expand button, which > if clicked on with the accuracy of a surgeon it is possible to select > the track without expanding it. > My preference would be that when SyncLock is off, the track icon > disappears but the track expand button does not grow to fill the > space, but that the space remains empty, leaving a space that the user > can click on when the track is minimised. +1. Sync-Lock is off by default and it would be a solution to (easily) select a minimised track in that default case. I think it would look OK to remove that "sliver" between the track name and the expand button; I don't think it would make the icon look like a button when in minimised state. The space saved would add up when you had a lot of tracks. > Regarding the icon / tiles, I'm not overly concerned about what the > graphic is, but using a literal representation of a clock would tend > to invite the question of whether there is any significance to 1:55. > As it represents "synchronization" rather than "time", perhaps > something a bit less literal would convey the meaning more clearly, > for example:http://www.google.co.uk/images?q=synchronize&tbs=isch:1,isz:i&biw=1366&bih=549 -1. Those icons made me think of file synchronisation, or exchanging tracks' vertical order, or the Undo/Redo icon we already use in Edit Toolbar. If there is a mnemonic for movement it should I think be horizontal. But given an icon can mean anything, I think the clock is OK and will look a bit less oppressive since the clocks don't have to be linked together. Gale |