Thread: [Audacity-devel] Ready for next round of RC's?
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2012-02-29 21:48:00
|
Gale, thanks for fixing the links issues in the manual. Is the bug fix from yesterday, in Sequence::ConvertToSampleFormat(), tested and confirmed on all platforms, at least for the new bug? I'm confident it's okay on Win. How about Mac? I committed the fix past the Mac nightly time, but I think Michael was going to build and test it. That is, are we ready for the next round of RC's? (The target was 21:00 GMT.) Do we need to wait for the next Mac nightly and do the RC's tomorrow? - Vaughan |
From: Gale (A. Team) <ga...@au...> - 2012-02-29 22:24:41
|
Vaughan wrote: > Is the bug fix from yesterday, in Sequence::ConvertToSampleFormat(), > tested and confirmed on all platforms, at least for the new bug? Just for completeness, on cursory testing yes 32-bit float > 24-bit and > 16-bit was fixed on Windows, but clearly we aren't ready (IMO) given the 16-bit to 32-bit issue I just posted about. Gale -- View this message in context: http://audacity.238276.n2.nabble.com/Ready-for-next-round-of-RC-s-tp7330779p7330900.html Sent from the audacity-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2012-02-29 22:50:18
|
Thanks, Gale and Michael, for your follow-ups. (I think Michael meant to send the below to the lists rather to me only.) Gale's found another P1, so definitely, we are not ready for the next round of RC's. I'll keep you posted on my progress on the bug. :-( - V On 2/29/2012 2:26 PM, Michael Chinen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Vaughan Johnson > <va...@au...> wrote: >> Gale, thanks for fixing the links issues in the manual. >> >> Is the bug fix from yesterday, in Sequence::ConvertToSampleFormat(), >> tested and confirmed on all platforms, at least for the new bug? > > Tested ok on linux and mac, here. > >> >> I'm confident it's okay on Win. How about Mac? I committed the fix past >> the Mac nightly time, but I think Michael was going to build and test it. >> >> That is, are we ready for the next round of RC's? (The target was 21:00 >> GMT.) Do we need to wait for the next Mac nightly and do the RC's tomorrow? > > I built and tested it on the mac with my normal debug configuration, > not the universal release dmgs. > I now have the ability to build mac dmgs but I think it's better to > use Paul's nightly since mine haven't been tested and there is a > possibility something is wrong. > Sorry if this was unclear. > > Also, the linux RC7s are current. > > Michael > |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2012-03-01 04:45:25
|
On 2/29/2012 2:40 PM, Vaughan Johnson wrote: > [..] > > Gale's found another P1, so definitely, we are not ready for the next > round of RC's. I'll keep you posted on my progress on the bug. :-( > Michael, Martyn, and I have been working on this bug, and the whack-a-moles it generated, and I think we've fixed them. Thanks! But we're past the Mac nightly deadline. So that means the next target for full round of RC's (and start of 48-hour cycle) is 21:00 GMT on March 3. - V |
From: Vaughan J. <va...@au...> - 2012-03-01 20:45:59
|
On 3/1/2012 9:33 AM, Gale Andrews wrote: > > | From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> > | Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:49:26 -0800 > | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Ready for next round of RC's? >> On 2/29/2012 2:40 PM, Vaughan Johnson wrote: >>> [..] >>> >>> Gale's found another P1, so definitely, we are not ready for the next >>> round of RC's. I'll keep you posted on my progress on the bug. :-( >>> >> >> Michael, Martyn, and I have been working on this bug, and the >> whack-a-moles it generated, and I think we've fixed them. Thanks! >> >> But we're past the Mac nightly deadline. So that means the next target >> for full round of RC's (and start of 48-hour cycle) is 21:00 GMT on March 3. Actually, that was a typo. It should be 21:00 GMT on March 2, as the Mac nightly including the changes will be available 03:15 GMT March 2. > > We want as many people as possible testing sample format > conversions via copy/paste/import/Track Drop-Down Menu etc. , > and we want testing as early as possible, so for those on Win who > don't build Audacity there is a build here you can try: > http://www.gaclrecords.org.uk/audacity-win-ansi-2.0.0.zip . Thanks, Gale. > > I've only got ANSI at the moment but it's fine for testing if you stick > to English language/files named with Latin characters. > > Do multiple conversion tasks like setting quality to 32-bit, importing > 16-bit WAV via read-only, convert to 16-bit using drop-down menu, > generate in a new track and convert (or don't convert) that to 16-bit, > copy and paste between tracks; then import a WMA or MP4 which will > import as 16-bit then do more copy/paste/conversion etc. > > All variants you can dream up. > > Test copying-in files also. Won't hurt to test sample rate conversions > too. +1. Thanks, Gale. - V |
From: Martyn S. <mar...@gm...> - 2012-03-01 23:58:34
|
On 01/03/2012 20:50, Vaughan Johnson wrote: > On 3/1/2012 9:33 AM, Gale Andrews wrote: >> >> | From Vaughan Johnson<va...@au...> >> | Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:49:26 -0800 >> | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Ready for next round of RC's? >>> On 2/29/2012 2:40 PM, Vaughan Johnson wrote: >>>> [..] >>>> >>>> Gale's found another P1, so definitely, we are not ready for the next >>>> round of RC's. I'll keep you posted on my progress on the bug. :-( >>>> >>> >>> Michael, Martyn, and I have been working on this bug, and the >>> whack-a-moles it generated, and I think we've fixed them. Thanks! More Vaughan and Michael than me actually, and 'Thanks!' to both of them! >>> But we're past the Mac nightly deadline. So that means the next target >>> for full round of RC's (and start of 48-hour cycle) is 21:00 GMT on March 3. > > Actually, that was a typo. It should be 21:00 GMT on March 2, as the Mac > nightly including the changes will be available 03:15 GMT March 2. I won't be doing the audacity-win-2.0rc5 versions until after that, since it's a Friday I'm going out with the wife, but I'll try and get to them the same evening. >> >> We want as many people as possible testing sample format >> conversions via copy/paste/import/Track Drop-Down Menu etc. , >> and we want testing as early as possible, so for those on Win who >> don't build Audacity there is a build here you can try: >> http://www.gaclrecords.org.uk/audacity-win-ansi-2.0.0.zip . > > Thanks, Gale. +1 >> >> I've only got ANSI at the moment but it's fine for testing if you stick >> to English language/files named with Latin characters. >> >> Do multiple conversion tasks like setting quality to 32-bit, importing >> 16-bit WAV via read-only, convert to 16-bit using drop-down menu, >> generate in a new track and convert (or don't convert) that to 16-bit, >> copy and paste between tracks; then import a WMA or MP4 which will >> import as 16-bit then do more copy/paste/conversion etc. >> >> All variants you can dream up. +1 TTFN Martyn >> Test copying-in files also. Won't hurt to test sample rate conversions >> too. > > +1. Thanks, Gale. > > - V > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization& Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > Audacity-quality mailing list > Aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality |