Thread: [Audacity-devel] Win 1.3.11 uploaded
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Martyn S. <mar...@go...> - 2010-01-18 22:25:35
|
Hi I just put the zip and installer on http://code.google.com/p/audacity/downloads/list I included SoundFinder.ny at Gale's request, and removed opensearch_desc.php from the manual. Who's updating http://code.google.com/p/audacity/ ? Obviously we need the other files up. TTFN Martyn |
From: Richard A. <ri...@au...> - 2010-01-18 22:56:46
|
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 22:25 +0000, Martyn Shaw wrote: > I just put the zip and installer on > http://code.google.com/p/audacity/downloads/list > Obviously we need the other files up. Done - all three sets uploaded and ready to go. Richard |
From: Martyn S. <mar...@go...> - 2010-01-18 23:14:31
|
Nice one, thanks everybody! Are we unfrozen now? Martyn Richard Ash wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 22:25 +0000, Martyn Shaw wrote: >> I just put the zip and installer on >> http://code.google.com/p/audacity/downloads/list > >> Obviously we need the other files up. > Done - all three sets uploaded and ready to go. > > Richard > > |
From: James C. <cr...@in...> - 2010-01-20 23:03:12
|
+1 to "Nice one". The double freeze is officially over now. There are no known P1s. Proposal is the next release is March 1st, with a double freeze a week earlier. This is on the very reasonable assumption that by then we will have enough other new fixes in Audacity to make it worth while to release. That looks very likely, the way things are going. Well done everyone. --James. On 18/01/2010 23:14, Martyn Shaw wrote: > Nice one, thanks everybody! > > Are we unfrozen now? > > Martyn > > Richard Ash wrote: > >> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 22:25 +0000, Martyn Shaw wrote: >> >>> I just put the zip and installer on >>> http://code.google.com/p/audacity/downloads/list >>> >> >>> Obviously we need the other files up. >>> >> Done - all three sets uploaded and ready to go. >> >> Richard >> |
From: Ed M. <edg...@wa...> - 2010-01-20 23:38:51
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: James Crook [mailto:cr...@in...] > > Proposal is the next release is March 1st, with a double freeze a week earlier. [ --Ed ] +1 I particularly like the idea of a full week of double freeze. This gives us a better chance to iron out the release mechanism. --Ed |
From: Martyn S. <mar...@go...> - 2010-01-20 23:59:07
|
Ed Musgrove wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Crook [mailto:cr...@in...] >> >> Proposal is the next release is March 1st, with a double freeze a week > earlier. > [ --Ed ] > +1 > I particularly like the idea of a full week of double freeze. This gives us > a better chance to iron out the release mechanism. Do you perceive a problem there? I thought it went quite well this time, apart from me mis-naming the zip. Martyn > --Ed > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the > world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference > attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through > interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > audacity-devel mailing list > aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel > |
From: Ed M. <edg...@wa...> - 2010-01-21 01:06:11
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Martyn Shaw [mailto:mar...@go...] > Ed Musgrove wrote: > > I particularly like the idea of a full week of double freeze. This > > gives us a better chance to iron out the release mechanism. > > Do you perceive a problem there? I thought it went quite well this time, apart from me > mis-naming the zip. > [ --Ed ] This most recent freeze, as I recall, was scheduled for two days. I do not believe that that was enough time to build, upload and test. It seems that building and uploading for all the platforms takes one day (remember, those building are scattered all over the world); the testing of the various installers and zipped packages on multiple OSs may need some QA. What I envision is something like a spreadsheet with all the operating systems listed with a "verified" box for both "installer" and "zipped" -- each option would be signed off by a developer after testing. --Ed |
From: James C. <cr...@in...> - 2010-01-21 11:23:46
|
The most recent (double) freeze was longer than two days. The release did go well, especially considering it was an accelerated release to fix a specific issue. Thanks to the Nyquist fix it included more than originally anticipated. Ed, a wiki page "Release 1.3.12 Progress" could be good. I'd be happy for it to have more than just a table of where we are at in trial builds, if you have ideas for it, and start using it before we actually get into the double freeze. Do you want to start such a page? --James. On 21/01/2010 00:25, Ed Musgrove wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martyn Shaw [mailto:mar...@go...] >> Ed Musgrove wrote: >> >>> I particularly like the idea of a full week of double freeze. This >>> gives us a better chance to iron out the release mechanism. >>> >> Do you perceive a problem there? I thought it went quite well this time, >> > apart from me > >> mis-naming the zip. >> >> > [ --Ed ] > This most recent freeze, as I recall, was scheduled for two days. I do not > believe that that was enough time to build, upload and test. It seems that > building and uploading for all the platforms takes one day (remember, those > building are scattered all over the world); the testing of the various > installers and zipped packages on multiple OSs may need some QA. What I > envision is something like a spreadsheet with all the operating systems > listed with a "verified" box for both "installer" and "zipped" -- each > option would be signed off by a developer after testing. > > --Ed > |
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2010-01-23 06:34:02
|
| From James Crook <cr...@in...> | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:22:24 +0000 | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Win 1.3.11 uploaded > The most recent (double) freeze was longer than two days. The release > did go well, especially considering it was an accelerated release to fix > a specific issue. Thanks to the Nyquist fix it included more than > originally anticipated. > > Ed, a wiki page "Release 1.3.12 Progress" could be good. I'd be happy > for it to have more than just a table of where we are at in trial > builds, if you have ideas for it, and start using it before we actually > get into the double freeze. Do you want to start such a page? What else could such a page contain? I think there could be a risk that whoever maintains the page forgets in the heat of a release and then we're back to e-mail anyway to find out what's going on. I think I'd vote for the immediacy of e-mail in this case. Gale > On 21/01/2010 00:25, Ed Musgrove wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Martyn Shaw [mailto:mar...@go...] > >> Ed Musgrove wrote: > >> > >>> I particularly like the idea of a full week of double freeze. This > >>> gives us a better chance to iron out the release mechanism. > >>> > >> Do you perceive a problem there? I thought it went quite well this time, > >> > > apart from me > > > >> mis-naming the zip. > >> > >> > > [ --Ed ] > > This most recent freeze, as I recall, was scheduled for two days. I do not > > believe that that was enough time to build, upload and test. It seems that > > building and uploading for all the platforms takes one day (remember, those > > building are scattered all over the world); the testing of the various > > installers and zipped packages on multiple OSs may need some QA. What I > > envision is something like a spreadsheet with all the operating systems > > listed with a "verified" box for both "installer" and "zipped" -- each > > option would be signed off by a developer after testing. > > > > --Ed |
From: Ed M. <edg...@wa...> - 2010-01-23 17:52:31
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Gale Andrews [mailto:ga...@au...] > > | From James Crook <cr...@in...> > > Ed, a wiki page "Release 1.3.12 Progress" could be good. I'd be happy > > for it to have more than just a table of where we are at in trial > > builds, if you have ideas for it, and start using it before we > > actually get into the double freeze. Do you want to start such a page? > > What else could such a page contain? I think there could be a risk that whoever maintains > the page forgets in the heat of a release and then we're back to e-mail anyway to find out > what's going on. [ --Ed ] My idea was for a simple checklist of everything that needs to be done -- announce the freeze; edit header files to bump version; create and upload the RCs for the various OSes; test all RCs to ensure they install correctly on a "virgin" system, on top of 1.2.6, and on top of the previous beta etc.. Someone with wiki edit privileges would announce the freeze and edit the wiki to erase the previous signoffs. Then when someone accomplishes one of the tasks on the check off list they (or someone with wiki edit privileges) would put their name next to that item. > I think I'd vote for the immediacy of e-mail in this case. > [ --Ed ] It is very difficult, using e-mail, to ensure that EVERYTHING gets done. --Ed |