audacity-devel Mailing List for Audacity (Page 1588)
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(77) |
Dec
(169) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(139) |
Feb
(147) |
Mar
(111) |
Apr
(348) |
May
(262) |
Jun
(294) |
Jul
(315) |
Aug
(186) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(135) |
Nov
(358) |
Dec
(241) |
2003 |
Jan
(557) |
Feb
(489) |
Mar
(361) |
Apr
(378) |
May
(493) |
Jun
(348) |
Jul
(289) |
Aug
(259) |
Sep
(322) |
Oct
(463) |
Nov
(305) |
Dec
(201) |
2004 |
Jan
(198) |
Feb
(186) |
Mar
(192) |
Apr
(216) |
May
(175) |
Jun
(200) |
Jul
(277) |
Aug
(127) |
Sep
(64) |
Oct
(208) |
Nov
(170) |
Dec
(154) |
2005 |
Jan
(239) |
Feb
(171) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(100) |
Jul
(129) |
Aug
(221) |
Sep
(209) |
Oct
(270) |
Nov
(590) |
Dec
(313) |
2006 |
Jan
(377) |
Feb
(189) |
Mar
(234) |
Apr
(180) |
May
(230) |
Jun
(404) |
Jul
(574) |
Aug
(300) |
Sep
(424) |
Oct
(444) |
Nov
(363) |
Dec
(153) |
2007 |
Jan
(223) |
Feb
(106) |
Mar
(311) |
Apr
(233) |
May
(336) |
Jun
(278) |
Jul
(467) |
Aug
(416) |
Sep
(550) |
Oct
(503) |
Nov
(483) |
Dec
(271) |
2008 |
Jan
(344) |
Feb
(127) |
Mar
(416) |
Apr
(381) |
May
(679) |
Jun
(749) |
Jul
(549) |
Aug
(281) |
Sep
(137) |
Oct
(324) |
Nov
(200) |
Dec
(330) |
2009 |
Jan
(634) |
Feb
(438) |
Mar
(560) |
Apr
(387) |
May
(313) |
Jun
(443) |
Jul
(947) |
Aug
(505) |
Sep
(477) |
Oct
(679) |
Nov
(714) |
Dec
(407) |
2010 |
Jan
(348) |
Feb
(283) |
Mar
(232) |
Apr
(173) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(128) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(118) |
Oct
(153) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(76) |
2011 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(150) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(266) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(113) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(106) |
Dec
(190) |
2012 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(188) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(122) |
Jun
(222) |
Jul
(94) |
Aug
(239) |
Sep
(64) |
Oct
(164) |
Nov
(168) |
Dec
(277) |
2013 |
Jan
(336) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(135) |
May
(150) |
Jun
(139) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(266) |
Sep
(386) |
Oct
(465) |
Nov
(366) |
Dec
(156) |
2014 |
Jan
(190) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(146) |
Jun
(104) |
Jul
(189) |
Aug
(424) |
Sep
(235) |
Oct
(990) |
Nov
(598) |
Dec
(393) |
2015 |
Jan
(256) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(195) |
Apr
(497) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(138) |
Jul
(257) |
Aug
(351) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(119) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(16) |
2016 |
Jan
(225) |
Feb
(289) |
Mar
(267) |
Apr
(318) |
May
(198) |
Jun
(177) |
Jul
(155) |
Aug
(268) |
Sep
(175) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(147) |
Dec
(67) |
2017 |
Jan
(110) |
Feb
(148) |
Mar
(191) |
Apr
(210) |
May
(164) |
Jun
(261) |
Jul
(332) |
Aug
(349) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(171) |
Nov
(199) |
Dec
(153) |
2018 |
Jan
(351) |
Feb
(182) |
Mar
(345) |
Apr
(113) |
May
(76) |
Jun
(176) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(171) |
Sep
(183) |
Oct
(310) |
Nov
(150) |
Dec
(23) |
2019 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(73) |
Mar
(172) |
Apr
(119) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(145) |
Jul
(66) |
Aug
(60) |
Sep
(89) |
Oct
(104) |
Nov
(89) |
Dec
(157) |
2020 |
Jan
(126) |
Feb
(322) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(98) |
May
(227) |
Jun
(194) |
Jul
(374) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(122) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(72) |
2021 |
Jan
(120) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(169) |
Apr
(167) |
May
(115) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Lynn A. <l_d...@ad...> - 2006-10-14 21:45:28
|
NoiseRemoval was a similar challenge to get it configured for "chaining/batching" ... you need to save off the 1024 32-bit floats that represent the result of capturing the NoiseRemovalProfile (NRP) ... otherwise you have to recapture the NRP each time ... which defeats the purpose. The original "forked-spinoff" version of CleanSpeech had the "notion" of "Presets" ... so that Pastor Adams in the sanctuary on Sunday could have a separate "preset" than Pastor Adams in the auditorium on Wednesday (AdamsSanctuary.preset vs AdamsAuditorium.preset). You would apply the same degree of "Silent-Truncation" and "Leveling" to him, but the NoiseRemovalProfile might be very different because of the different room acoustics and recording equipment. These "presets" were written and read from a file that was very specific to the "chain of effects" that CleanSpeech used. It kept track of whether to remove-dc-offset during normalization, how strong to level, parameters for silent-truncation, etc, but also it wrote out the 4kb buffer of the NRP (as binary data iirc). The integration of CleanSpeech back into the code base of Audacity was much more general, but some of the conveniences of "presets" might have been diminished (or I haven't taken the time to fuller understand the current approach ... mea culpa). ----- Original Message ----- From: Mar...@ao... To: aud...@li... Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 3:23 PM Subject: [Audacity-devel] EQ and batch mode Hi I'm trying to get the Equalization code to work in batch mode. I've got the parameter passing bit working but I have hit a problem that I don't know what to do about. The code to work out what the filter parameters are is part of EqualizationDialog, which of course does not get called in batch mode; EffectEqualization::Process() gets called directly and the filter has not been configured. Is there a quick fix to this do you think? What approach should I be taking? TTFN Martyn PS I don't expect I'll have this done by the end of the week! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Audacity-devel mailing list Aud...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |
From: <Mar...@ao...> - 2006-10-14 21:23:18
|
Hi I'm trying to get the Equalization code to work in batch mode. I've got the parameter passing bit working but I have hit a problem that I don't know what to do about. The code to work out what the filter parameters are is part of EqualizationDialog, which of course does not get called in batch mode; EffectEqualization::Process() gets called directly and the filter has not been configured. Is there a quick fix to this do you think? What approach should I be taking? TTFN Martyn PS I don't expect I'll have this done by the end of the week! |
From: Leland <aud...@ho...> - 2006-10-14 18:30:46
|
On 10/14/06 1:20 PM, "Mar...@ao..." <Mar...@ao...> wrote: > Not happening here any more, and I appear to have everything up to date from > CVS. Initially I (think I) deleted the pre-build event bits from the > project files but a few days later I got new project files from CVS and it > didn't > do it so I assumed you had fixed it! Is it some kind of a date clash thing? > I "think" so, but I haven't been able to make any sense of it yet. A question that I need answering is whether the last changed date/time of a forced include file is used for build determinations. (Google won't let me down!!! ;-)) Leland |
From: Udo v. d. H. <ud...@xs...> - 2006-10-14 18:22:07
|
me...@me... wrote some time ago: > first, I think it shouldn't be disputed that the close button should close the window where it belongs to and not other windows. Since Audacity is a SDI app (each top-level window contains one document, just like, say Paintbrush, Write or Notepad), the close button closes the current document. Given this, it acts just like "File/Close" and not like "File/Exit". If Audacity were a MDI app (one top-level window with sub-level windows for the documents, like Microsoft Office 2000), the close button would act like "File/Exit", but it isn't. > > Second, in a SDI app, you cannot have an "empty workspace" (with no documents open) as you can in a MDI app. This is, closing the last document will exit the app. This is considered unsatisfactory by some users who come from the Mac (where SDI is standard, but you can close the last document and still have the app's menu shown) or who are familiar with MDI apps on Windows. Therefore, we have this option (for people who like it) where you can specify that closing the last window should not really exit Audacity but create a new document. Because (as we learned above) the close button always acts like "File/Close", in this case closing the last document will create a new, empty document. If the current document is already empty, this will just appear as "redrawing" the window, because the visual representation does not change. > > I hope that makes things a little clearer. Did you ever check out how e.g. gedit works? Gedit is a simple text editor for the Gnome environment. Available on Fedora Core, perhaps others. Here you can close the app with the cross and also have the application running with no document open. The reason that the universal upper right hand corner cross does not do what it is assumed and expected to be doing is strange. Also: why is the application redrawn at a slightly different place on the desktop when I try to use the cross in the upper right hand corner? All in all audacity does not behave (in this small area of behaviour) like I expect nor can I configure the behaviour that is expected. While I like audacity it is unique in this regard (file close/exit & cross confusion), at least in the apps that I see from day to day. Please fix. |
From: <Mar...@ao...> - 2006-10-14 18:20:24
|
> In a message dated 14/10/2006 18:47:58 GMT Daylight Time, _au...@ho..._ (mailto:aud...@ho...) writes: > Hi Martyn, > > On 10/3/06 7:20 PM, "_Ma...@ao..._ (mailto:Mar...@ao...) " <_Ma...@ao..._ (mailto:Mar...@ao...) > wrote: > > > > > So that's an unnecessary compile and a link I have to wait for! Previously > > none of this happened. That's 9 seconds of my life gone, forever, several > > times! ;-) > > > Are you still having this problem??? Because it's now happening here on > portmixer. I known "what" I did (and it doesn't make ANY sense). But, at > least I have something to work with. > Not happening here any more, and I appear to have everything up to date from CVS. Initially I (think I) deleted the pre-build event bits from the project files but a few days later I got new project files from CVS and it didn't do it so I assumed you had fixed it! Is it some kind of a date clash thing? Martyn |
From: Leland <aud...@ho...> - 2006-10-14 17:47:46
|
Hi Martyn, On 10/3/06 7:20 PM, "Mar...@ao..." <Mar...@ao...> wrote: > > So that's an unnecessary compile and a link I have to wait for! Previously > none of this happened. That's 9 seconds of my life gone, forever, several > times! ;-) > Are you still having this problem??? Because it's now happening here on portmixer. I known "what" I did (and it doesn't make ANY sense). But, at least I have something to work with. Leland |
From: <ga...@au...> - 2006-10-14 15:35:37
|
| From Dominic Mazzoni <do...@au...> | Mon, 9 Oct 2006 23:51:13 -0700 | Subject: [Audacity-devel] Vst-bridge and audacityteam.org/vst | That's what point releases are for - I think it would be better to | call it 1.0.1 so that people who have 1.0 know they should upgrade. | I went ahead and uploaded it as-is and updated the site text to | reflect the change. Next time let's increment the version number, | though. | Also, if you need something on audacityteam updated, feel free to | put my email address in the to line (not just audacity-devel) so I'll | see the message in my main inbox and take care of it quicker. Sorry but I find the new text is too simple on http://audacityteam.org/vst/ I am talking about the Windows version of the VST-bridge as that is my system but surely we need to be specific that they have to install the VST bridge which means that the destination folder should be Audacity's Plug-Ins Folder (which the Windows installer does not seem to default to) or if not, vst-bridge.so or vst-bridge.dll has to be manually copied to Audacity's Plug-ins folder. Otherwise e.g. I suspect we'll have people putting the .exe installer in Audacity's Plug-Ins folder and expecting it to work. Gale Outbound message virus free. Tested on: 10/14/2006 4:35:34 PM |
From: Bo B. <bo....@te...> - 2006-10-14 05:39:27
|
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:43:00 -0500, Leland <aud...@ho...> wrote: > >On 10/13/06 5:37 PM, "Bo Berglund" <bo....@te...> wrote: > >> Fresh checkout is apparently needed, question is how often? >> >To be honest, I always do a fresh checkout to a new directory. I'm probably >being just a little paranoid, but I want to make sure I always get >everything correctly without any lingering extras. > >But, that's just me I guess... > It is genarally a good procedure to follow in a multi-developer environment in order to detect people creating new files in the project that they "forget" to add to CVS and therefore their environment builds fine but others do not. Actually the detection will work by just updating the sandbox for everyone except the developer who is forgetful. So having a build check procedure that always checks out fresh sources first is a GOOD THING for all developers... I will move the vidgets out of my sandbox and redirect the environment variable so that it does not matter where the audacity sources are located. Bo Berglund |
From: Leland <aud...@ho...> - 2006-10-13 22:43:04
|
On 10/13/06 5:37 PM, "Bo Berglund" <bo....@te...> wrote: > Fresh checkout is apparently needed, question is how often? > To be honest, I always do a fresh checkout to a new directory. I'm probably being just a little paranoid, but I want to make sure I always get everything correctly without any lingering extras. But, that's just me I guess... Leland |
From: Bo B. <bo....@te...> - 2006-10-13 22:37:31
|
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:01:37 -0500, Leland Lucius <aud...@ho...> wrote: >Hi Bo, > >Quoting Bo Berglund <bo....@te...>: > >> >> I wanted to get a working build environment even though I am not used >> to C++ coding (I am a Delphi Pascal programmer) so I installed VS 2005 >> today and when it was all done I opened the sln file in my sandbox >> like I did back in January. >> The build chugged along for a while and then I had a heap of errors: >> ... >> >It doesn't look like you got a full CVS copy. Could you try to do a checkout to >a completely new directory? I'll be damned! First is did a cvs update on the existing sandbox. No joy! Then I did a cvs checkout on top of the existing sandbox. Same! Finally I renamed my sandbox, checked out fresh and then copied in the wxvidgets dir I have inside the sandbox and fired up VS2005 and built audacity. Now it finishes OK and I have the exe file! :-) What bugs me is that CVS is supposed to be used such that if one has a working sandbox then cvs update will give all the changes other developers have done into the sandbox and it will still build. I have been working with CVS for about 5-6 years now on a daily basis so I think I know the way it is supposed to work. But this defies understanding.... Fresh checkout is apparently needed, question is how often? >> >This one looks like you have a difference between your wxWidgets build and the >Audacity build. When you build wxWidgets libraries, did you use the project >files from the win\wx_additions directory? > Yes, I followed the compile.txt instructions. But now everything compiles again on a fresh checkout... Strange. (Shrug) Bo Berglund |
From: Bo B. <bo....@te...> - 2006-10-13 19:18:52
|
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:55:20 -0500, Leland Lucius <aud...@ho...> wrote: >Quoting Bo Berglund <bo....@te...>: > >> >> However, now the convenient tool button to click to place a label is >> gone, why? I now need to use the Ctrl-B shortcut instead. >> >Was it on the Transcription toolbar? (I don't have access to the source right >now.) If so, it was decided (a while ago) that since most of the stuff on the >transcription toolbar was incomplete, it would be temporarily hidden until >someone has a chance to work on it. > I guess it was... And now I think I am getting senile too... Searching this NG for libsendfile brought up a discussion less than a month ago originated by *myself* when I tried to get going building audacity. Aapparently I finally succeeded by checking out the sources fresh to a Virual PC machine (that I had completely forgotten about). I thought that I had installed VS 2005 but could not find it cause it was in the VM... Now I have installed VS2005 in my regular machine and I am checking out the sources anew as I am writing this. Hopefully the problems will go away. :-) Bo Berglund |
From: Leland L. <aud...@ho...> - 2006-10-13 19:01:37
|
Hi Bo, Quoting Bo Berglund <bo....@te...>: > > I wanted to get a working build environment even though I am not used > to C++ coding (I am a Delphi Pascal programmer) so I installed VS 2005 > today and when it was all done I opened the sln file in my sandbox > like I did back in January. > The build chugged along for a while and then I had a heap of errors: > > 7>portmixer - 3 error(s), 0 warning(s) > These are: > 7>c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: > '..\src\px_win_wmme.c': No such file or directory > 7>px_win_common.c > 7>c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: > '..\src\px_win_common.c': No such file or directory > 7>px_mixer.c > 7>c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: > '..\src\px_mixer.c': No such file or directory > > When I look there are no such files too. Even after updating src with > create missing directories and such do these files appear.... > It doesn't look like you got a full CVS copy. Could you try to do a chec= kout to a completely new directory? > > 9>libsndfile - 115 error(s), 0 warning(s) > A typical example of the 115 errors is: > > 9>f:\engineering\projects\audacity\lib-src\libsndfile\src\common.h(614) > : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '*' > Let's worry about this one after you've verified you've got a full copy..= . > > 18>Internat.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: > __thiscall wxString::wxString(wchar_t const *,class wxMBConv > &,unsigned int)" (??0wxString@@QAE@PB_WAAVwxMBConv@@I@Z) > 18>.\Release/audacity.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved > externals > 18>Project : warning PRJ0018 : The following environment variables > were not found: > 18>$(DXSDK_DIR) > 18>Audacity - 2 error(s), 2 warning(s) > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Build: 15 succeeded, 3 failed, 0 up-to-d= ate, 0 skipped > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > This one looks like you have a difference between your wxWidgets build an= d the Audacity build. When you build wxWidgets libraries, did you use the proj= ect files from the win\wx_additions directory? Leland ----- End forwarded message ----- |
From: Leland L. <aud...@ho...> - 2006-10-13 18:55:26
|
Quoting Bo Berglund <bo....@te...>: > > However, now the convenient tool button to click to place a label is > gone, why? I now need to use the Ctrl-B shortcut instead. > Was it on the Transcription toolbar? (I don't have access to the source = right now.) If so, it was decided (a while ago) that since most of the stuff o= n the transcription toolbar was incomplete, it would be temporarily hidden unti= l someone has a chance to work on it. Leland |
From: Bo B. <bo....@te...> - 2006-10-13 18:48:09
|
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:09:48 -0500, Leland <aud...@ho...> wrote: >Ok Bo, > >I've rebuilt the binaries (Windows only) with the fix included. Check it >out and see how it works for ya. > >They are at the usual place: > >http://audacity.sourceforge.net/files/audacity-win-1.3.1-beta.zip >http://audacity.sourceforge.net/files/audacity-win-1.3.1-unicode-beta.zip > >Leland > Downloaded the binaries since I could not make VS2005 build audacity properly :-( Sure, now Stereo-to-Mono is not disabled after I created some labels. However, now the convenient tool button to click to place a label is gone, why? I now need to use the Ctrl-B shortcut instead. Bo Berglund |
From: Bo B. <bo....@te...> - 2006-10-13 18:25:03
|
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:09:48 -0500, Leland <aud...@ho...> wrote: >Ok Bo, > >I've rebuilt the binaries (Windows only) with the fix included. Check it >out and see how it works for ya. > >They are at the usual place: > >http://audacity.sourceforge.net/files/audacity-win-1.3.1-beta.zip >http://audacity.sourceforge.net/files/audacity-win-1.3.1-unicode-beta.zip > >Leland > I wanted to get a working build environment even though I am not used to C++ coding (I am a Delphi Pascal programmer) so I installed VS 2005 today and when it was all done I opened the sln file in my sandbox like I did back in January. The build chugged along for a while and then I had a heap of errors: 7>portmixer - 3 error(s), 0 warning(s) These are: 7>c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: '..\src\px_win_wmme.c': No such file or directory 7>px_win_common.c 7>c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: '..\src\px_win_common.c': No such file or directory 7>px_mixer.c 7>c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file: '..\src\px_mixer.c': No such file or directory When I look there are no such files too. Even after updating src with create missing directories and such do these files appear.... 9>libsndfile - 115 error(s), 0 warning(s) A typical example of the 115 errors is: 9>f:\engineering\projects\audacity\lib-src\libsndfile\src\common.h(614) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ')' before '*' 18>Internat.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall wxString::wxString(wchar_t const *,class wxMBConv &,unsigned int)" (??0wxString@@QAE@PB_WAAVwxMBConv@@I@Z) 18>.\Release/audacity.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals 18>Project : warning PRJ0018 : The following environment variables were not found: 18>$(DXSDK_DIR) 18>Audacity - 2 error(s), 2 warning(s) ========== Build: 15 succeeded, 3 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ========== Looks like there are 3 failed subprojects in my source tree.... Any clues? Bo Berglund |
From: Leland L. <aud...@ho...> - 2006-10-13 15:56:54
|
Quoting Parker Morse <par...@tu...>: Just curious...being a grad student, do you get paid for teaching or, at = least, get a tuition discount? BTW: Go for the Facebook (whatever that is). You don't look old and you= might be amazed at how many younger ppl (mid to upper teens) would gravitate to= our table when my wife and I would go out to eat (we used to go out a LOT). = And believe me, we have a few years on you. We think it was because we were older and treated them with respect and e= quals.=20 Well, it might have had more to do with the boss allowing them to...;-) Leland |
From: Leland L. <aud...@ho...> - 2006-10-13 15:33:55
|
Quoting Parker Morse <par...@tu...>: > * In this coming Monday's lab, I'm planning a bug day. I'm going to > ask the students to confirm, locate, or patch bugs. I'm going to try > to weight it towards location, i.e. posting comments saying, "I think > this can be fixed in the XXY function of the YYZ source file." or > similarly helpful statements, because I'm not sure any but the > superstars will be able to generate a good patch in the lab time > period, but I am leaving the door open for patches (which I'll have > them submit to me, and I'll then forward once I've checked them.) The > lab is all WinXP machines with VS 2005; if there are particular bugs > anyone wants confirmed/located/patched, please let me know and I'll > try to direct effort towards them. > Which version of Audacity will y'all be working with? We are just about = ready to release another beta and I think your class would be an extreme benefi= t to us if they were to bang away at the current (CVS HEAD) sources. It might= even make it more "fun" for them as they'd be more likely to find something. Would that be too "unpredictable" for a classroom setting? Leland |
From: Parker M. <par...@tu...> - 2006-10-13 15:04:23
|
(I've posted before about our software engineering class using Audacity in our labs.) * In this coming Monday's lab, I'm planning a bug day. I'm going to ask the students to confirm, locate, or patch bugs. I'm going to try to weight it towards location, i.e. posting comments saying, "I think this can be fixed in the XXY function of the YYZ source file." or similarly helpful statements, because I'm not sure any but the superstars will be able to generate a good patch in the lab time period, but I am leaving the door open for patches (which I'll have them submit to me, and I'll then forward once I've checked them.) The lab is all WinXP machines with VS 2005; if there are particular bugs anyone wants confirmed/located/patched, please let me know and I'll try to direct effort towards them. * Reminder that on Tuesday at 6 PM, Neeraj Sangal of Lattix will be demonstrating their architecture visualization tool using Audacity in our regular class session. Let me know if you're in the (Boston) area and interested in attending, and I'll send details. I'll also try to take notes and send a summary to the list if anyone's interested. pjm |
From: James C. <cr...@in...> - 2006-10-13 13:58:12
|
OK. That makes sense. --James. Markus Meyer wrote: > James Crook schrieb: >> Just for clarification, if releasing HEAD as 1.3.2, we would still do a >> 1.3.3 a little later, which would be a genuine candidate for being >> renamed 1.4.0 after 1.3.3 had had a couple of months of widespread testing? >> > James, > > IMHO that "1.3.3" would actually be named "1.4RC1" (RC being "release > candidate"). > > > Markus > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Audacity-devel mailing list > Aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel > > |
From: Markus M. <me...@me...> - 2006-10-13 13:28:02
|
James Crook schrieb: > Just for clarification, if releasing HEAD as 1.3.2, we would still do a > 1.3.3 a little later, which would be a genuine candidate for being > renamed 1.4.0 after 1.3.3 had had a couple of months of widespread testing? > James, IMHO that "1.3.3" would actually be named "1.4RC1" (RC being "release candidate"). Markus |
From: James C. <cr...@in...> - 2006-10-13 13:00:55
|
Just for clarification, if releasing HEAD as 1.3.2, we would still do a 1.3.3 a little later, which would be a genuine candidate for being renamed 1.4.0 after 1.3.3 had had a couple of months of widespread testing? Seems a good way forward. We'll need to review release notes carefully, as it is VERY important we make it clear what is experimental/beta in this release. --James. Dominic Mazzoni wrote: > On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:33 AM, Markus Meyer wrote: >> Dominic Mazzoni schrieb: >>> 1.3.2 should ship without additional translations. We should send it >>> to translators after we have a feature freeze. >>> >> I agree that we should not delay the release by the translation >> process, >> but translations which are already in CVS should be included in the >> release. E.g., de.po is regularily updated and most of the new strings >> are already translated. > > Agreed. > > Is there any way to mark certain strings? Like, could we put all of > the menu items at the top and have people translate just those? It'd > be neat if there was a way to prioritize the strings to translate, > because some of them come up a lot less than others. > > - Dominic > >> Markus |
From: Tino M. <a.t...@ch...> - 2006-10-13 11:52:20
|
Op vr, 13-10-2006 te 01:40 -0700, schreef Dominic Mazzoni: > Is there any way to mark certain strings? Like, could we put all of > the menu items at the top and have people translate just those? It'd > be neat if there was a way to prioritize the strings to translate, > because some of them come up a lot less than others. There is no need to do that: Part of the translation proces is actually testing the translation in the application. You can quickly see which strings need te be translated first. An experienced translator is usually able to prioritize strings for translation even without looking at the interface. Tino Meinen |
From: Dominic M. <do...@au...> - 2006-10-13 08:40:37
|
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:33 AM, Markus Meyer wrote: > Dominic Mazzoni schrieb: >> 1.3.2 should ship without additional translations. We should send it >> to translators after we have a feature freeze. >> > I agree that we should not delay the release by the translation > process, > but translations which are already in CVS should be included in the > release. E.g., de.po is regularily updated and most of the new strings > are already translated. Agreed. Is there any way to mark certain strings? Like, could we put all of the menu items at the top and have people translate just those? It'd be neat if there was a way to prioritize the strings to translate, because some of them come up a lot less than others. - Dominic > > Markus > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Audacity-devel mailing list > Aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |
From: Markus M. <me...@me...> - 2006-10-13 08:32:51
|
Dominic Mazzoni schrieb: > 1.3.2 should ship without additional translations. We should send it > to translators after we have a feature freeze. > I agree that we should not delay the release by the translation process, but translations which are already in CVS should be included in the release. E.g., de.po is regularily updated and most of the new strings are already translated. Markus |
From: Dominic M. <do...@au...> - 2006-10-13 08:17:16
|
Yeah, real life got in the way for me in a big way. But you're totally right, and I was kind of waiting too for someone else to realize that enough is enough, we need to release and move on to the next version! I don't have enough time to do it myself, but I can definitely help! Luckily doing a beta release is easier than releasing 1.4.0 will be. And I've released Audacity a bunch of times so I know how to do it. Next weekend (one week from today) is good for me. If you guys want to clean up everything and have some builds ready by then, that would be awesome! Can we do 1.2.5 at the same time? It's not a dramatic improvement, but it'd be great to do both. If possible, email the test builds to audacity-users and post them on the forum also, that's a great way to get a lot of extra help. Next step is to make a list of the major new features and write an announcement. Alexandre already did that; probably the best idea would be to pick only the most important features to keep it simple and to the point. Then send the announcement to the audacity- translation mailing list as soon as possible so they can translate it. The last steps are to upload the final version of the files to Sourceforge, change the redirect download links on the site, then put up the announcement, and finally email our announcement list (at least 100,000 people) and watch the huge flurry of traffic come in! If we can do 1.2.5, I will do the Mac build, because I have my computer all set up to compile a version that runs on 10.2 instead of depending on 10.4. I can also do an Intel Mac build of 1.2.5. It sounds like hopefully Leland can take care of the rest of the builds? 1.3.2 should ship without additional translations. We should send it to translators after we have a feature freeze. - Dominic On Oct 12, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Leland wrote: > > Oh, you go girl!!! ;-) > > You are right of course. I just think "real life" has gotten in > the way for > everyone. I even had to spend a little extra time on the real job > (eeeewww!) this last week or so. > > I personally am gonna jump back in and clean up a couple of messes > I have > made. (for Markus and Jereon) I will hit those hard and heavy this > weekend. > > But, like you I don't really know how to do a release either. I > mean the > last one seemed like a heap of work on the website, announcements, > and such. > I'd wager that building the actual binaries is the easiest part. > > Leland > > On 10/12/06 7:45 PM, "Mar...@ao..." <Mar...@ao...> wrote: > >> OK, so I have not been very active over the last few weeks, but I >> did quite >> a number of hours on Audacity over the last year or so and am >> frustrated that >> nothing has been released on an 'official' level. A number of >> others (both >> developers and users) must be similarly frustrated, I imagine. >> The current >> HEAD is (in my opinion) much better than the current beta on >> http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ so why isn't it out there? Is >> there a >> problem I'm not aware >> of? >> >> I am aware that there are a number of unresolved issues on the >> Release >> Checklist http://audacityteam.org/wiki/index.php? >> title=Release_Checklist but >> I >> can't see any show-stoppers that were not there before, and no >> 'regressions'. >> >> I know the answer will be 'so why haven't you done that then' but >> I don't >> know how to release a version, and don't feel capable of doing so. >> >> So how about 'releasing' HEAD as a beta? >> >> Martyn >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >> security? >> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your >> job easier >> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >> Geronimo >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? >> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Audacity-devel mailing list >> Aud...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, > security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your > job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? > cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Audacity-devel mailing list > Aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel |