Menu
▾
▴
asunit-users — This list is for the users of AsUnit that are not involved in it's development.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Vineeta S. <vsr...@li...> - 2005-11-08 17:29:17
|
<html> <body> Luke:<br><br> My name is Vineeta and I'm contacting you from Lintas, LLC a Global Business Consulting Group.<br><br> One of our clients in Midwest region has a need for Macromedia Flex Developer. <br><br> Skills Required:<br> Strong Flex, Cold Fusion, Oracle and SQL development experience with TOAD, UNIX Shell Scripting, Java, and Web Services/XML would be definite assets. Education/Knowledge: University or College Diploma in related field;<br><br> If interested please send your resume in word format along with desired hourly rate and contact details.<br><br> Best Regards,<br> Vineeta.<br> <x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep> Vineeta Srivastav<br> <font color="#FF0000">LIN</font><font color="#0000FF">TAS</font>, LLC.<br> 566 West Adams Street, 4th Floor,<br> Chicago, Illinois 60661<br> (312) 681-5400 -Phone<br> (312) 681-5454 - Fax<br> <font color="#0000FF"><u>vsr...@li...<br> </u></font> <a href="http://www.lintas.com/xdoc/images/index.html?sth...@li..."> <img src="cid:6.2...@li....0" width=70 height=30 alt="111104.jpg"> </a></u> <br> </body> </html> |
|
From: Bill S. <wds...@co...> - 2005-11-08 11:34:56
|
Hi, A funny thing happened. I downloaded ASUnit-2.7.alpha.zip from the mirror site (URL provided in the FlashCommm_chttyfig site and I got a message "corrputed file" when I attempted to open it. (I tried it from the NY and VA mirrors). I then went to your site and when I clicked the Download, I noticed that when the mirrors showed up, the file size was different and it downloaded and opened fine. Thanks, Bill bill sanders | www.sandlight.com | bloomfield, ct | 860-242-2260 |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-11-08 07:18:00
|
Sorry for the dearth of documentation! Basically, take a look at AsUnit.as and how it instantiates TestCases for the framework. This is how it works now - any application that will host TestCases must extend TestRunner. For now, that means asunit.textui.TestRunner, but may (i= n the near future) include asunit.desktop.TestRunner or asunit.localconn.TestRunner... Once you've got that one, you just create TestSuites and TestCases as before. I have a xulrunner desktop application that will auto-create these for you if you're interested, but it's kind of strange and has even less documentation. I'll post it to sourceforge this week and let you know as soon as it's ready. Hit me up again if this wasn't much help - I've been drinking tonight. ;-) Thanks, Luke |
|
From: Keith P. <kp...@bi...> - 2005-11-08 06:06:04
|
So, any major changes in the workflow or methods? I don't see any new docs or change lists... _____ From: asu...@li... [mailto:asu...@li...] On Behalf Of Luke Bayes Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:25 PM To: asu...@li... Subject: Re: [Asunit-users] AsUnit 3.0 alpha released! Hey Keith, Thanks for the heads up! I'm not sure what was causing the problem, but a few more tries seems to have taken care of it. Please let me know if you have any other questions or issues! Thanks, Luke Bayes www.asunit.org On 11/7/05, Keith Peters <kp...@bi...> wrote: Hmm... tried all the mirrors, file keeps coming in as corrupt. I'll try again in the morning. |
|
From: Keith P. <kp...@bi...> - 2005-11-08 06:01:51
|
Yup, got it now! _____ From: asu...@li... [mailto:asu...@li...] On Behalf Of Luke Bayes Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:25 PM To: asu...@li... Subject: Re: [Asunit-users] AsUnit 3.0 alpha released! Hey Keith, Thanks for the heads up! I'm not sure what was causing the problem, but a few more tries seems to have taken care of it. Please let me know if you have any other questions or issues! Thanks, Luke Bayes www.asunit.org On 11/7/05, Keith Peters <kp...@bi...> wrote: Hmm... tried all the mirrors, file keeps coming in as corrupt. I'll try again in the morning. |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-11-08 04:25:04
|
Hey Keith, Thanks for the heads up! I'm not sure what was causing the problem, but a few more tries seems to have taken care of it. Please let me know if you have any other questions or issues! Thanks, Luke Bayes www.asunit.org <http://www.asunit.org> On 11/7/05, Keith Peters <kp...@bi...> wrote: > > Hmm... tried all the mirrors, file keeps coming in as corrupt. I'll try > again in the morning. > |
|
From: Keith P. <kp...@bi...> - 2005-11-08 02:25:47
|
Hmm... tried all the mirrors, file keeps coming in as corrupt. I'll try again in the morning. _____ From: asu...@li... [mailto:asu...@li...] On Behalf Of Luke Bayes Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:00 PM To: asunit-users Cc: Flashcoders mailing list; fle...@ya...; fle...@ly... Subject: [Asunit-users] AsUnit 3.0 alpha released! Hey Folks, I'm elated to announce the alpha release of AsUnit 3.0! This build has been completely rebuilt from the ground up using the JUnit sources, and provides complete support for ActionScript 3.0! You can get the latest build from: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/asunit/AsUnit-3.0.1.alpha.zip?download <http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/asunit/AsUnit-3.0.1.alpha.zip?download> Or, as always, you can go to www.asunit.org to get the sources. Thanks, Luke Bayes Ali Mills www.asunit.org |
|
From: Keith P. <kp...@bi...> - 2005-11-08 02:21:00
|
Sweet! Good timing for me, too. Keith _____ From: asu...@li... [mailto:asu...@li...] On Behalf Of Luke Bayes Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:00 PM To: asunit-users Cc: Flashcoders mailing list; fle...@ya...; fle...@ly... Subject: [Asunit-users] AsUnit 3.0 alpha released! Hey Folks, I'm elated to announce the alpha release of AsUnit 3.0! This build has been completely rebuilt from the ground up using the JUnit sources, and provides complete support for ActionScript 3.0! You can get the latest build from: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/asunit/AsUnit-3.0.1.alpha.zip?download <http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/asunit/AsUnit-3.0.1.alpha.zip?download> Or, as always, you can go to www.asunit.org to get the sources. Thanks, Luke Bayes Ali Mills www.asunit.org |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-11-08 02:00:26
|
Hey Folks, I'm elated to announce the alpha release of AsUnit 3.0! This build has been completely rebuilt from the ground up using the JUnit sources, and provides complete support for ActionScript 3.0! You can get the latest build from: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/asunit/AsUnit-3.0.1.alpha.zip?download Or, as always, you can go to www.asunit.org <http://www.asunit.org> to get the sources. Thanks, Luke Bayes Ali Mills www.asunit.org <http://www.asunit.org> |
|
From: Ali M. <ali...@gm...> - 2005-11-05 03:41:05
|
Very cool, that's good to hear. We'll probably post it next week sometime. Thanks for helping out! Ali On 11/3/05, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Ali, > > The build you sent me seems to work fine. I'd say release it - I had no > immediate problems. > > Cheers, > Alias > > > On 11/1/05, Ali Mills <ali...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Alias, > > > > The status of AsUnit for Flash 8 is that it's done - mostly at least. > > Luke and I haven't posted it yet mainly because we've been too busy. > > We've been migrating AsUnit to AS3. It's coming along nicely. > > > > Let me send you the build I'm using. It should work for you in Flash > > 8 authoring. I'll send it to you off list. > > > > If it works for you, Luke and I will probably go ahead and release it. > > > > Thanks for the heads up. > > > > > > Ali > > > > > > On 11/1/05, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Just wondering - what is the current status of AsUnit in the Flash 8 > IDE? I > > > know that the JSFL commands on the version I've got (latest stable > release, > > > AFAIK) have problems, as there seems to be some version checking code > which > > > fails with this message: > > > > > > >> To use this feature, you must update your installation of Flash t= o > > > Version 7.2 or greater. Go to http://www.macromedia.com/flash to find > the > > > updater. > > > > > > Not a huge problem, as I usually create these classes via Eclipse > > > templates. However, I'm not totally sure that the UI panel is connect= ing > to > > > the testsuite - none of my asserts are shouwing up, even though the > > > identical setup works fine in MX 2004. Has anyone else noticed this, = or > is > > > it just a problem on my side somewhere? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Alias > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ali > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download > > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: > http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > > _______________________________________________ > > Asunit-users mailing list > > Asu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users > > > > -- Ali |
|
From: Alias <ali...@gm...> - 2005-11-03 11:49:40
|
Hi Ali, The build you sent me seems to work fine. I'd say release it - I had no immediate problems. Cheers, Alias On 11/1/05, Ali Mills <ali...@gm...> wrote: > > Alias, > > The status of AsUnit for Flash 8 is that it's done - mostly at least. > Luke and I haven't posted it yet mainly because we've been too busy. > We've been migrating AsUnit to AS3. It's coming along nicely. > > Let me send you the build I'm using. It should work for you in Flash > 8 authoring. I'll send it to you off list. > > If it works for you, Luke and I will probably go ahead and release it. > > Thanks for the heads up. > > > Ali > > > On 11/1/05, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Just wondering - what is the current status of AsUnit in the Flash 8 > IDE? I > > know that the JSFL commands on the version I've got (latest stable > release, > > AFAIK) have problems, as there seems to be some version checking code > which > > fails with this message: > > > > >> To use this feature, you must update your installation of Flash to > > Version 7.2 or greater. Go to http://www.macromedia.com/flash to find > the > > updater. > > > > Not a huge problem, as I usually create these classes via Eclipse > > templates. However, I'm not totally sure that the UI panel is connectin= g > to > > the testsuite - none of my asserts are shouwing up, even though the > > identical setup works fine in MX 2004. Has anyone else noticed this, or > is > > it just a problem on my side somewhere? > > > > Cheers, > > Alias > > > > > -- > Ali > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Asunit-users mailing list > Asu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users > |
|
From: steve a. <st...@ns...> - 2005-11-02 09:13:30
|
Hi, can't get going with ASUnit, when I go to commands >> create class I get the following error: At line 6 of file [path to application data]\Macromedia\Flash MX 2004\en\Configuration\External Libraries\asunit\ConfigureFileSeparator.jsfl Reference Error FLfile not defined With flash 8 i get: >> To use this feature, you must update your installation of Flash to Version 7.2 or greater. Go to http://www.macromedia.com/flash to find the updater. Any ideas cheers Steve Anson |
|
From: Ali M. <ali...@gm...> - 2005-11-01 21:35:32
|
Alias, The status of AsUnit for Flash 8 is that it's done - mostly at least.=20 Luke and I haven't posted it yet mainly because we've been too busy.=20 We've been migrating AsUnit to AS3. It's coming along nicely. Let me send you the build I'm using. It should work for you in Flash 8 authoring. I'll send it to you off list. If it works for you, Luke and I will probably go ahead and release it. Thanks for the heads up. Ali On 11/1/05, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just wondering - what is the current status of AsUnit in the Flash 8 IDE= ? I > know that the JSFL commands on the version I've got (latest stable releas= e, > AFAIK) have problems, as there seems to be some version checking code whi= ch > fails with this message: > > >> To use this feature, you must update your installation of Flash to > Version 7.2 or greater. Go to http://www.macromedia.com/flash to find the > updater. > > Not a huge problem, as I usually create these classes via Eclipse > templates. However, I'm not totally sure that the UI panel is connecting = to > the testsuite - none of my asserts are shouwing up, even though the > identical setup works fine in MX 2004. Has anyone else noticed this, or i= s > it just a problem on my side somewhere? > > Cheers, > Alias > -- Ali |
|
From: Alias <ali...@gm...> - 2005-11-01 15:45:35
|
Hi guys, Just wondering - what is the current status of AsUnit in the Flash 8 IDE? I know that the JSFL commands on the version I've got (latest stable release, AFAIK) have problems, as there seems to be some version checking code which fails with this message: >> To use this feature, you must update your installation of Flash to Version 7.2 or greater. Go to http://www.macromedia.com/flash to find the updater. Not a huge problem, as I usually create these classes via Eclipse templates= . However, I'm not totally sure that the UI panel is connecting to the testsuite - none of my asserts are shouwing up, even though the identical setup works fine in MX 2004. Has anyone else noticed this, or is it just a problem on my side somewhere? Cheers, Alias |
|
From: Alias <ali...@gm...> - 2005-10-17 22:47:57
|
Hi Luke, That's cool :) I think it's definitely the way to go, at least for me, as I've found the window swf generally a bit unreliable, and having to switch between the flash IDE & Eclipse to check if my tests have passed is a bit counterproductive. I've actually asked about it on the MTASC list - Nicholas Canasse had this to say: >If I remember correctly I think usualy you call startDrag on an mc instanc= e > >mc.startDrag(false,0,.....) > >so there is no need for "target". So the issue is more to do with the Flash 8 compiler being strict in a different, slightly strange way. The other thing I noticed was that the dra= g parameters were getting switched around. I'm going to get the source and se= e if I can get it to work properly. I deployed my first properly unit tested class today, and I was surprised how well it turned out. If I get it working, where should I email the patch to? Cheers, Alias On 10/17/05, Luke Bayes <lb...@gm...> wrote: > > Hey Alias, > > As it turns out, you've discovered a feature that was baked into the > very first builds of AsUnit and actually hasn't gotten any attention > since! > > I was running into a bug in the Macro compiler that prevented that > LocalOutputPanel from displaying properly. Rather than chasing it > down, I just stopped development on it and left it sad and neglected > for all this time. > > Fortunately, you have resurrected it at a perfect time! > > We will take a look at the sources and see what we can find to make > that panel work properly. It's definitely *not* a bug in MTASC. In > general, MTASC is stricter than MMC and forces one to actually write > clean code - which that LocalOutputPanel probably isn't... > > If you're interested in inserting the fix yourself, please feel free > to download the latest sources into your classpath from CVS at > sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=3D108947) and submit a > patch via email. We'll integrate it into the next build which should > be coming out shortly! > > > Thanks, > > Luke Bayes > www.asunit.com <http://www.asunit.com> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Asunit-users mailing list > Asu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users > |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-10-17 17:56:55
|
Hey Alias, As it turns out, you've discovered a feature that was baked into the very first builds of AsUnit and actually hasn't gotten any attention since! I was running into a bug in the Macro compiler that prevented that LocalOutputPanel from displaying properly. Rather than chasing it down, I just stopped development on it and left it sad and neglected for all this time. Fortunately, you have resurrected it at a perfect time! We will take a look at the sources and see what we can find to make that panel work properly. It's definitely *not* a bug in MTASC. In general, MTASC is stricter than MMC and forces one to actually write clean code - which that LocalOutputPanel probably isn't... If you're interested in inserting the fix yourself, please feel free to download the latest sources into your classpath from CVS at sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=3D108947) and submit a patch via email. We'll integrate it into the next build which should be coming out shortly! Thanks, Luke Bayes www.asunit.com |
|
From: Alias <ali...@gm...> - 2005-10-16 01:47:05
|
Argh -
Further investigation seems to indicate that the compile errors are actuall=
y
due to some incorrect parameter specification in the intrinsics, and with
the modification I've made, the project now stops working in the Flash 8
compiler:
According to the flash 8 complier:
ScrollHandle.as: Line 24: startDrag requires 1 (target), 2 (target+lock) or
6 (target+lock+constraint) parameters.
This would suggest that the AsUnit code is actually correct, and the MTASC
compiler is wrong. I'll post this to the MTASC list and see if anyone has
any suggestions.
Cheers,
Alias
On 10/16/05, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Answering my own question:
>
> I managed to get it working, by taking the following steps:
> /**
> * @author Alias
> */
> import AllTests;
> import com.asunit.controls.LocalOutputPanel;
> class RunTests {
> public static function main() : Void {
>
> //set up stage to view correctly in FDT swf viewer
> Stage.align =3D "TL";
> Stage.scaleMode =3D "noScale";
>
> //launch local output panel
> var testInstance:LocalOutputPanel =3D LocalOutputPanel.getInstance(_root,
> 1);
> Sys.println("Hello MTASC!");
>
> //run test suite
> var tests:AllTests =3D new AllTests();
> }
> }
>
>
> Setting the swf launcher up, as per the FDT demo movie for MTASC Launcher=
:
> See here: http://fdt.powerflasher.com/flashsite/flash.htm
> (click MTASC Examples > MTASC Launcher > Demo #1
>
> MTASC only complained about a couple of things:
>
> - It couldn't find the Sys class - I suspect there are many better ways t=
o
> solve this, but I just copied Sys.as <http://Sys.as> from my configuratio=
n
> folder to the root of my project
> - It threw a type errors in:
>
> in class:
> com.asunit.controls.ScrollHandle
> changed line 24
> from:
> startDrag(this, false, 0, _parent.upArrow._y, 0,
> _parent.getHandleTravel());
> to:
> startDrag(false, 0, _parent.upArrow._y, 0, _parent.getHandleTravel());
>
> in class:
> LocalOutputPanel.as
> Line 117
> Change from:
> startDrag(this);
> to:
> startDrag();
>
> Then MTASC happily compiles (although there are a few unused import
> warnings, nothing fatal).
>
> This is with the latest alpha, release candidate by the way.
>
> Hope someone find this useful,
> Alias
>
>
>
> On 10/16/05, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I've been setting up my project's test suites to run with FDT and MTASC=
,
> > and it's a really nice, tightly integrated workflow.
> >
> > However - what I'd really like to do would be to set up the Local Outpu=
t
> > console (which I only know about because I accidentally ran ASUnit's ow=
n
> > tests) to show my test results - this would mean I only need to have on=
e swf
> > open in Eclipse - my main swf bult from MTASC.
> >
> > Is it possible to get this set up so that I don't have to compile in th=
e
> > flash IDE to see my test results?
> >
> > Even better would be ASUnit/FDT integration, so that it could display
> > the test results and allow you to jump directly to the testcase of a fa=
iled
> > test - but I guess that's a request for the FDT guys :)
> >
> > Anyway - to recap - I want to create a testcase class which will launch
> > the AsUnit local output panel, or if anyone has a better way of integra=
ting
> > ASUnit into Eclipse/FDT I'd love to hear about it,
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Alias
> >
>
>
|
|
From: Alias <ali...@gm...> - 2005-10-16 01:35:09
|
Hi guys,
Answering my own question:
I managed to get it working, by taking the following steps:
/**
* @author Alias
*/
import AllTests;
import com.asunit.controls.LocalOutputPanel;
class RunTests {
public static function main() : Void {
//set up stage to view correctly in FDT swf viewer
Stage.align =3D "TL";
Stage.scaleMode =3D "noScale";
//launch local output panel
var testInstance:LocalOutputPanel =3D LocalOutputPanel.getInstance(_root, 1=
);
Sys.println("Hello MTASC!");
//run test suite
var tests:AllTests =3D new AllTests();
}
}
Setting the swf launcher up, as per the FDT demo movie for MTASC Launcher:
See here: http://fdt.powerflasher.com/flashsite/flash.htm
(click MTASC Examples > MTASC Launcher > Demo #1
MTASC only complained about a couple of things:
- It couldn't find the Sys class - I suspect there are many better ways to
solve this, but I just copied Sys.as <http://Sys.as> from my configuration
folder to the root of my project
- It threw a type errors in:
in class:
com.asunit.controls.ScrollHandle
changed line 24
from:
startDrag(this, false, 0, _parent.upArrow._y, 0, _parent.getHandleTravel())=
;
to:
startDrag(false, 0, _parent.upArrow._y, 0, _parent.getHandleTravel());
in class:
LocalOutputPanel.as
Line 117
Change from:
startDrag(this);
to:
startDrag();
Then MTASC happily compiles (although there are a few unused import
warnings, nothing fatal).
This is with the latest alpha, release candidate by the way.
Hope someone find this useful,
Alias
On 10/16/05, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been setting up my project's test suites to run with FDT and MTASC,
> and it's a really nice, tightly integrated workflow.
>
> However - what I'd really like to do would be to set up the Local Output
> console (which I only know about because I accidentally ran ASUnit's own
> tests) to show my test results - this would mean I only need to have one =
swf
> open in Eclipse - my main swf bult from MTASC.
>
> Is it possible to get this set up so that I don't have to compile in the
> flash IDE to see my test results?
>
> Even better would be ASUnit/FDT integration, so that it could display the
> test results and allow you to jump directly to the testcase of a failed t=
est
> - but I guess that's a request for the FDT guys :)
>
> Anyway - to recap - I want to create a testcase class which will launch
> the AsUnit local output panel, or if anyone has a better way of integrati=
ng
> ASUnit into Eclipse/FDT I'd love to hear about it,
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Alias
>
|
|
From: Alias <ali...@gm...> - 2005-10-16 00:44:49
|
Hi guys, I've been setting up my project's test suites to run with FDT and MTASC, an= d it's a really nice, tightly integrated workflow. However - what I'd really like to do would be to set up the Local Output console (which I only know about because I accidentally ran ASUnit's own tests) to show my test results - this would mean I only need to have one sw= f open in Eclipse - my main swf bult from MTASC. Is it possible to get this set up so that I don't have to compile in the flash IDE to see my test results? Even better would be ASUnit/FDT integration, so that it could display the test results and allow you to jump directly to the testcase of a failed tes= t - but I guess that's a request for the FDT guys :) Anyway - to recap - I want to create a testcase class which will launch the AsUnit local output panel, or if anyone has a better way of integrating ASUnit into Eclipse/FDT I'd love to hear about it, Thanks in advance, Alias |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-09-29 22:36:30
|
Here's a pretty insightful link on the subject: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?GuiTesting Thanks, Luke On 9/29/05, M Daggett <hea...@gm...> wrote: > Hey Luke, > Do you know if those arguments against UI testing are online, I would li= ke > to read them. We use several types of UI testing in our applications. In > some cases we are ensuring there are no broken pages (which cannot be cau= ght > at the unit-test level). We also use things like JWebUnit to do persona > testing which again cannot really be done well at the unit testing level.= I > do think there needs to be a UI testing framework for Flash and Flex beca= use > many of the errors that I worry about are not related to a particular > component's performance. Instead, I worry about the combination of > components on the final presentation layer and how they interact with one > another. > > Later, > Mark > > > On 9/28/05, Luke Bayes <lb...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Hey Mark, > > > > I just wanted to make the point that there is a huge distinction > > between UI testing and Unit testing. > > > > I have heard very compelling arguments against automated UI test > > fixtures and have seen competent development houses build quality > > software with more manual/scripted processes for testing their UI. > > Some of the main problems associated with automating this process have > > to do with how fragile these tests tend to be. Unlike unit tests, they > > tend to impede development and refactoring and by the end of a project > > and can often wind up being ignored because of their fragility. > > > > I should qualify these assessments with the fact that they are > > definitely anecdotal for me as I have never worked on a project with > > an automated UI test framework... > > > > On the other hand, there is no reason you can't build Unit tests for a > > Flex application if you're building components using ActionScript. You > > can make sure that your module does what it is supposed to do, and > > simply use MXML as the "glue" for a series of objects. If you find > > yourself wishing you had an automated test for an mxml entity, you > > should probably consider refactoring your application to put the > > complexity in a scripting language rather than the more declarative > > language of XML. > > > > Good luck, > > > > Luke Bayes > > www.asunit.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > os...@os... > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > I am Mark Daggett and I approve this message. > |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-09-29 19:30:48
|
SGV5IEV2ZXJ5b25lLAoKSWYgeW91J3JlIG9uIGEgbWFjIGFuZCB1c2luZyBGOCwgdGhlcmUgbWF5 IGJlIHNvbWUgcHJvYmxlbXMhCgpXZSdyZSBhd2FyZSBvZiBpdCwgYW5kIHdlIHNob3VsZCBoYXZl IGEgZml4IGluIGJ5IHRoaXMgd2Vla2VuZC4KCgpUaGFua3MsCgoKTHVrZQp3d3cuYXN1bml0LmNv bQoKCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0gRm9yd2FyZGVkIG1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0tLS0tLQpGcm9tOiBMdWtlIEJh eWVzIDxsYmF5ZXNAbHVrZWJheWVzLmNvbT4KRGF0ZTogU2VwIDI5LCAyMDA1IDEyOjI5IFBNClN1 YmplY3Q6IFtGd2Q6IEJ1Zy1GaXggRmxhc2g4IG9uIE1hY10KVG86IGxiYXllc0BnbWFpbC5jb20K CgoKCi0tLS0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0tLS0KU3ViamVjdDogICAgICAgIEJ1 Zy1GaXggRmxhc2g4IG9uIE1hYwpEYXRlOiAgIFRodSwgMjkgU2VwIDIwMDUgMTQ6NDY6MzMgKzAy MDAKRnJvbTogICBUaWJvciBDbGFhc3NlbiA8dGlib3JAaW1hZ2VyYXRvci5jb20+ClRvOiAgICAg THVrZSBCYXllcyA8bGJheWVzQGx1a2ViYXllcy5jb20+CgoKCkhpIEx1a2UsCgp3aGVuIEkgdHJp ZWQgdG8gdGVzdCBZb3VyIGN1cnJlbnQgYWxwaGEgcmVsZWFzZSBvbiBteSBQb3dlckJvb2ssIEkK Zmlyc3QgaGFkIHRvIG5vdGljZSB0aGF0IHRoZSBiZWhhdmlvdXIgb2YgdGhlIEZsYXNoLUphdmFT Y3JpcHQtQVBJCmRpZCBhZ2FpbiBjaGFuZ2UgaW4gRmxhc2ggOCBmb3IgTWFjLgpJdCBpcyBhbGwg YWJvdXQgdGhlIG9sZCBmaWxlcGF0aCBpc3N1ZSB0aGF0IGFscmVhZHkgbWFkZSB0aGUKZGlmZmVy ZW5jZXMgYmV0d2VlbiBib3RoIHBsYXRmb3JtcyBpbiB0aGUgcGFzdC4gTm93IHRoZSBGbGFzaC1B UEkgbm8KbG9uZ2VyIHJldHVybnMgTWFjaW50b3NoLWxpa2UgcGF0aHMgYW55bW9yZSAoIk15CkhE OkZvbGRlcjpGb2xkZXI6ZmlsZSIpIGJ1dCBQT1NJWCBwYXRocyAoICIvRm9sZGVyL0ZvbGRlci9m aWxlIikuCgpCZWNhdXNlIG9mIHRoYXQgQnVpbGRUZXN0U3VpdGVzLmpzZmwgZGlkIGFnYWluIGNy ZWF0ZSBBbGxUZXN0cy5hcy0KZmlsZXMgYWxsIG92ZXIgdGhlIHBsYWNlIHN0YXJ0aW5nIGF0IHJv b3QuIFNvIEkgZml4ZWQgdGhhdCBhbmQgZGlkCnNvbWUgcmVmYWN0b3Jpbmcgb24gdGhlIGNvbmNl cm5lZCBtZXRob2RzLiBUaGUgZXh0ZXJuYWwgc2NyaXB0CmxpYnJhcnkgaXMgbm93IGNhbGxlZCBs aWIuanNmbCBhbmQgdG9vayBvdmVyIHRoZSB3aG9sZSBwcm9jZXNzIG9mCmRldGVybWluaW5nIHRo ZSB2ZXJzaW9ucyBhbmQgZmlsZSBVUkkgZGV0ZXJtaW5hdGlvbi4gSSBmZWx0IHRoaXMgd2F5Cml0 IHNob3VsZCBiZSBlYXNpZXIgdG8gZXhwYW5kIGFuZCBmaXggZnV0dXJlIGlzc3Vlcy4KCkkgaG9w ZSBZb3UgbGlrZSBteSBjaGFuZ2VzIGFuZCB0aGV5IGNhbiBtYWtlIGl0IGluIHRoZSBuZXh0IHJl bGVhc2UuClRoaXMgdGltZSBJIHdhcyB0b28gbGF6eSB0byBjb21tZW50IGFsbCBteSBjaGFuZ2Vz LCBidXQgSSBob3BlIFlvdQpjYW4gZG8gYSBzaW1wbGUgZGlmZiBvbiBib3RoIHZlcnNpb25zIGFu ZCBlYXNpbHkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZCBteQpjaGFuZ2VzLiBGZWVsIGZyZWUgdG8gY29udGFjdCBtZSwg aWYgWW91IGhhdmUgYW55IHF1ZXN0aW9ucy4KKGJ0dzogWW91IGNhbiBjaGFuZ2UgdGhlIGxpY2Vu c2luZyBzdHVmZiB0byB3aGF0ZXZlciBZb3UgbGlrZSBpbgpsaWIuanNmbC4gSSBqdXN0IGhhdmUg bXkgc3RhbmRhcmQgY29tbWVudCBvbiB0b3AgdGhlcmUsIG5vIG5lZWQgdG8Ka2VlcCB0aGF0IG9u ZS4pCgpVbnRpbCBub3cgSSBkaWQgbm90IG1hbmFnZSB0byBnZXQgdGhlIE1vemlsbGEtWFVMIHZl cnNpb24gcnVubmluZyBvbgpteSBtYWNoaW5lIJYgaW5pdGlhbGx5IG15IG1haW4gdGFzayCWICwg YnV0IEkgd2lsbCB0cnkgaXQgYWdhaW4gc29vbiwKSSB0aGluay4gU28gaG9wZWZ1bGx5IEkgY2Fu IHByb3ZpZGUgWW91IHdpdGggc29tZSBmZWVkYmFjayBhYm91dCB0aGF0LgoKR3JlZXRpbmdzCgpU aWJvcgo= |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-09-28 21:39:54
|
Hey Mark, I just wanted to make the point that there is a huge distinction between UI testing and Unit testing. I have heard very compelling arguments against automated UI test fixtures and have seen competent development houses build quality software with more manual/scripted processes for testing their UI. Some of the main problems associated with automating this process have to do with how fragile these tests tend to be. Unlike unit tests, they tend to impede development and refactoring and by the end of a project and can often wind up being ignored because of their fragility. I should qualify these assessments with the fact that they are definitely anecdotal for me as I have never worked on a project with an automated UI test framework... On the other hand, there is no reason you can't build Unit tests for a Flex application if you're building components using ActionScript. You can make sure that your module does what it is supposed to do, and simply use MXML as the "glue" for a series of objects. If you find yourself wishing you had an automated test for an mxml entity, you should probably consider refactoring your application to put the complexity in a scripting language rather than the more declarative language of XML. Good luck, Luke Bayes www.asunit.com |
|
From: David H. <os...@ba...> - 2005-09-22 22:01:18
|
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:07:27PM -0700, Luke Bayes wrote: > I have to admit - this is definitely a unique request! > Does anyone else need this? It's fairly common when dealing with the approximations of floating point arithmetic to avoid exact equality comparisions between values. > Does JUnit or NUnit include this? JUnit _only_ provides assertions on float/double equality within a given epsilon. e.g., http://www.junit.org/junit/javadoc/3.8.1/junit/framework/Assert.html#assertEquals(double,%20double,%20double) http://www.docjar.com/html/api/junit/framework/Assert.java.html#x94 ta, dave -- http://david.holroyd.me.uk/ |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-09-22 19:07:54
|
I have to admit - this is definitely a unique request! Does anyone else need this? Does JUnit or NUnit include this? Thanks, Luke Bayes www.asunit.org <http://www.asunit.org> On 9/22/05, Ralf Bokelberg <in...@bo...> wrote: > > It would be nice to have AssertEpsilon. AssertEpsilon compares two > floating point numbers by comparing their distance to some epsilon. > Epsilon should be a static, which can be set/retrieved by the user. > > ------------------------------- > public static var EPSILON:Number =3D 0.000001; > > public static function assertEpsilon(msg:Object, assertion1:Object, > assertion2:Object):Void { > if(arguments.length =3D=3D 2) { > assertion2 =3D assertion1; > assertion1 =3D msg; > msg =3D ""; > } > addTestResult(String(msg), "assertEquals", typeof(assertion1) =3D=3D > typeof(assertion2) && > Math.abs(Number(assertion1)-Number(assertion2))<=3DEPSILON); > } > ------------------------------- > > I know, i can add it to the source. But maybe somebody else needs it too. > > Cheers, > Ralf. > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > os...@os... > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > |
|
From: Luke B. <lb...@gm...> - 2005-09-22 19:06:26
|
Hey Ralf, >> I wonder, if and why the ASUnit UI is trying to call a http address? >> Working with ASUnit in the new FlashPlayer 8 throws a warning. Thanks for the post! You're definitely paranoid! ;-) Sorry about the warnings in the new player - this is the first we've heard of it. Just so you know - it doesn't check with every test. It checks only once when the AsUnit Ui panel is opened. I felt that the concerns (that I too would share) would probably be outweighed by the benefits of being notified directly when a new version is released. As you requested, I DEFINITELY wanted to make that check optional but it turned into a question of time and energy vs. community desires... Now that it's been brought up, the upcoming release is probably not going to have this feature because the rest of the functionality will be built in XUL - which has it's own facility for checking for updates. If you're especially interested in getting rid of the check, you can definitely grab the sources and compile the swf without that code. I believ= e you can simply do a search for "load" and comment the offending line. We are definitely not a marketing organization so we don't know anything specific about anyone using AsUnit, but thanks to that check, I can tell yo= u that there are about 300 to 400 unique users using AsUnit on a daily basis. I'm not sure if this is high or low, but it's definitely more encouraging than zero! An unrelated bit of data from sourceforge usage stats, we've had 4,479 downloads since our launch in May of 2004. Woohoo! (OK - I downloaded about 4,478 of those!) Thanks, Luke Bayes www.asunit.org <http://www.asunit.org> ------------------------------------------------------- From: Ralf Bokelberg Ok, i found it in the sources, which are available at asunit.org<http://asunit.org/> . It seems like ASUnit is calling home to check for a new version. Cheers, Ralf. |
23 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
