From: David L N. <da...@we...> - 2003-06-24 08:16:43
|
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 00:03, KC7ZRU - Tate wrote: > There's more here than just a techical issue concerning the > public/developer servers - I'm sure there's a valid reason - just my > imagination hasen't yet managed to wrap my brain around it. Anyone on > teh devel team got any ideas they're willing to share? Ah, so there is. diff says the difference between current CVS (2.2.5-12 on 2003-06-04 03:02 EST) and 2.2.5-13 is the version number in configure.ac, ChangeLog mentioning the new version, default config file, and some support files. Looks like the new version number was simply not committed to CVS? Most of the changes in 2.2.5-13 seem to have been committed to CVS on May 28 or shortly thereafter. -- David Norris http://www.webaugur.com/dave/ ICQ - 412039 |