You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(12) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Alejandro S. <al...@gm...> - 2012-07-16 03:53:36
|
I've forked aprsd and started pushing to a git repo at GitHub: https://github.com/alejolp/aprsd Background: I've setup aprsd running at my local ham radio club. We don't have a machine powerful enough to run the java version, and since I've come to realize this code was not updated in years I guessed there should be some issues and bugs still lurking around. The changes so far: - The removal of autoconf dependency. I'm running Linux Debian 64, developing using Eclipse C++, and hardcoded a working config.h file. - Lots of compiler warnings and errors. Some undefined behaviors were (I think) fixed. - The class aprsString is no longer an std::string subclass. I'm also debugging the code using valgrind. So far there were some errors on incorrect new/delete combinations (new [] without delete[]), but I haven't done an intensive test. Until I get more familiar with the source code I'd still be fixing small issues. In the following weeks I'd star picking some issues from the Source Forge issue tracker. My mid/long term goal is to keep up with the new APRS stuff, but I'm no APRS expert myself. Comments are most welcome. 73 LU4EXT -- Alejandro Santos |
From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2006-08-08 22:59:43
|
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:55:14AM -0400, Chuck Byam wrote: > Is there any documentation around as to what ports, etc., they are using? > I don't subscribe to the lists anymore as I tired of the constant > bickering. I'm getting ready to update CVS with a number of changes to > the current codebase and may look this prior to updating. I've forwarded these to you off-list as they are in a private email currently. I expect it may be public as well or will be soon. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |
From: Chuck B. <cb...@vi...> - 2006-08-08 14:55:29
|
Hamish, Is there any documentation around as to what ports, etc., they are using?= =20 I don't subscribe to the lists anymore as I tired of the constant bickering. I'm getting ready to update CVS with a number of changes to the current codebase and may look this prior to updating. --=20 Chuck Byam, KG4IJB On Tue, August 8, 2006 10:06 am, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently the APRS core servers have started switching to UDP connection= s > since this functionality was recently added to javAPRSSrvr. > > Is anyone interested in adding this to aprsd? > > I confess that I'm not running it aprsd more due to its bitrotten state= . > If anyone is interested in taking it up I expect that CVS access at > sourceforge could be arranged. > > Thanks > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit= y? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geron= imo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Aprsd-devel mailing list > Apr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel > |
From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2006-08-08 14:06:50
|
Hi all, Recently the APRS core servers have started switching to UDP connections since this functionality was recently added to javAPRSSrvr. Is anyone interested in adding this to aprsd? I confess that I'm not running it aprsd more due to its bitrotten state. If anyone is interested in taking it up I expect that CVS access at sourceforge could be arranged. Thanks Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |
From: KC7ZRU <kc...@ar...> - 2004-05-26 06:18:08
|
Mmm, looks like this would be of interest to the aprsd devel folks.... -------- Original Message -------- To: <jav...@ya...> From: AE5PL Lists <Ham...@am...> Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 22:02:21 -0500 Subject: [javaprssrvr] javAPRSIGate Side Note One side note. During today's testing, I found a bug in aprsd but don't know who to tell anymore. Due to a bug in javAPRSIGate (fixed before release), I was transmitting a null (0x00) byte at the end of my packets. Lo and behold, two aprsd IGates in the area (actually, quite a way from me but we are having quite a bit of ducting today) were putting mangled packets on APRS-IS. It helped me find my problem, but it now explains why we see packets on APRS-IS which appear to be appended to another packet. That was what was happening with my packets. Another packet was being appended to my packet before insertion onto APRS-IS. Apparently, aprsd uses string instead of memory functions in C. Unfortunately, those functions look for a null byte as a string terminator. If the packet contains a null, it apparently causes confusion inside of aprsd. 73, Pete Loveall AE5PL mailto:pe...@ae... |
From: Dennis H. N. <n2...@n2...> - 2004-03-06 19:56:11
|
Nice work, thanks. I appreciate your work on the stat page. I don't know how much you want the project to progress, but with the latest client numbers showing nearly 500 aprsd machines running on the IS there is probably quite a few more out there that are supporting a decent amount of users. On Mar 6, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Roger Bille wrote: > Dennis, > > I found the problem. When the stat pages change I need to rewrite my > parser. What I didn't notices when I updated the aprsd one (for version > 2.2.4-4 and above) is that the field for Up-Time is saying e.g. 1 Day > and 3 > Days. I had fixed it to only allow Days (with ending s) so when it was > a > single day the parser didn't find the field and rejected the polling. I > think this is what you saw when you restarted your server. > > I don't know what 2.2.4-4 and above is showing when it is less that a > Day > so the parser might fail there as well currently it assume it in that > case > show 0 Day(s) x hours. > > 73 de sm5nrk/Roger > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dennis Hudson, N2LBT [mailto:n2...@n2...] >> Sent: den 6 mars 2004 17:19 >> To: Roger Bille >> Cc: 'Chris Bell'; apr...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Aprsd-devel] patches >> >> I got busy when I started to remove it. I only removed the second >> part, >> the network related code change, and it still is not showing on >> aprsswe. So, in essence yes, it is still applied. >> >> >> >> On Mar 6, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Roger Bille wrote: >> >>> Dennis, >>> >>> Do you have the patch installed at the moment? If not I suggest you >>> do that >>> again and let me know. I will then check what is failing with my >>> polling. >>> >>> 73 de sm5nrk/Roger > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Aprsd-devel mailing list > Apr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel |
From: Roger B. <rog...@te...> - 2004-03-06 19:46:45
|
Dennis, I found the problem. When the stat pages change I need to rewrite my parser. What I didn't notices when I updated the aprsd one (for version 2.2.4-4 and above) is that the field for Up-Time is saying e.g. 1 Day and 3 Days. I had fixed it to only allow Days (with ending s) so when it was a single day the parser didn't find the field and rejected the polling. I think this is what you saw when you restarted your server. I don't know what 2.2.4-4 and above is showing when it is less that a Day so the parser might fail there as well currently it assume it in that case show 0 Day(s) x hours. 73 de sm5nrk/Roger > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Hudson, N2LBT [mailto:n2...@n2...] > Sent: den 6 mars 2004 17:19 > To: Roger Bille > Cc: 'Chris Bell'; apr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Aprsd-devel] patches > > I got busy when I started to remove it. I only removed the second part, > the network related code change, and it still is not showing on > aprsswe. So, in essence yes, it is still applied. > > > > On Mar 6, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Roger Bille wrote: > > > Dennis, > > > > Do you have the patch installed at the moment? If not I suggest you > > do that > > again and let me know. I will then check what is failing with my > > polling. > > > > 73 de sm5nrk/Roger |
From: Dennis H. N. <n2...@n2...> - 2004-03-06 16:26:19
|
I got busy when I started to remove it. I only removed the second part, the network related code change, and it still is not showing on aprsswe. So, in essence yes, it is still applied. On Mar 6, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Roger Bille wrote: > Dennis, > > Do you have the patch installed at the moment? If not I suggest you > do that > again and let me know. I will then check what is failing with my > polling. > > 73 de sm5nrk/Roger |
From: Roger B. <rog...@te...> - 2004-03-06 15:46:57
|
Dennis, Do you have the patch installed at the moment? If not I suggest you do = that again and let me know. I will then check what is failing with my = polling.=20 73 de sm5nrk/Roger > -----Original Message----- > From: apr...@li... [mailto:aprsd-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Dennis Hudson, N2LBT > Sent: den 5 mars 2004 16:38 > To: Chris Bell > Cc: apr...@li... > Subject: Re: [Aprsd-devel] patches >=20 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > I got a little punch happy there hit the send button instead of save = as > draft. Sorry, I did the patch and got a good compile on my RH 7.3 box. > It fixed the counter bug, thanks BTW, but on of them might have broke > the query that Roger Bille uses at > http://www.ahubswe.net/aprs_stat.asp. I think I'll do some messing > around, to see if I can fix it, anyone have any ideas why it messed > with Roger's query? (which I know little about other than it looks at > the http formatted data on port 14501) >=20 >=20 > Dennis Hudson, N2LBT > sysop aprsdaly > Albany, NY >=20 >=20 > On Feb 29, 2004, at 4:36 PM, Chris Bell wrote: >=20 > > > > Hi, > > I successfully ported aprsd to solaris. Is there any interest > > in my changes? While I was at it, I also found two bugs. > > > > The first patch segment fixes the "currently connected users" count, > > [my system said -1 users] the second fixes a little/big endian > > bug. [no data read from network, httpport returns nothing] > > > > The solaris support is not clean, I had to hack the makefiles and = add > > several includes, so needs to be ported to autoconf. If there is = any > > interest, I could work on that. > > > > Chris Bell > > KD6ZWR > > cb...@ju... > > > > = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > Index: servers.cpp > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > RCS file: /cvsroot/aprsd/aprsd/src/servers.cpp,v > > retrieving revision 1.7 > > diff -c -r1.7 servers.cpp > > *** servers.cpp 1 Oct 2003 16:58:27 -0000 1.7 > > --- servers.cpp 29 Feb 2004 21:12:56 -0000 > > *************** > > *** 502,508 **** > > count++; > > > > for (int i =3D 0; i < nIGATES; i++) > > ! if (!cpIGATE[i].connected) > > count--; > > > > > > --- 505,511 ---- > > count++; > > > > for (int i =3D 0; i < nIGATES; i++) > > ! if (cpIGATE[i].connected) > > count--; > > > > > > > > *************** > > *** 2451,2457 **** > > > > int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) > > { > > ! int c; > > int i,BytesRead ,timeout; > > timespec ts; > > > > --- 2454,2460 ---- > > > > int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) > > { > > ! unsigned char c; > > int i,BytesRead ,timeout; > > timespec ts; > > > > > > = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1356&alloc_id=3D3438&op=3Dclick > > _______________________________________________ > > Aprsd-devel mailing list > > Apr...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel >=20 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 8.0.3 >=20 > iQA/AwUBQEie89v9YHSxGWFcEQKmeACdHpYiM4lvgUxzgP1M6QdusLHKPNMAoOp8 > JS5AgykCMfU/+jjSKA9a36i2 > =3DxmQ+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > = administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1470&alloc_id=3D3638&op=3Dcli= ck > _______________________________________________ > Aprsd-devel mailing list > Apr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel |
From: Dennis H. N. <n2...@n2...> - 2004-03-05 15:45:55
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I got a little punch happy there hit the send button instead of save as draft. Sorry, I did the patch and got a good compile on my RH 7.3 box. It fixed the counter bug, thanks BTW, but on of them might have broke the query that Roger Bille uses at http://www.ahubswe.net/aprs_stat.asp. I think I'll do some messing around, to see if I can fix it, anyone have any ideas why it messed with Roger's query? (which I know little about other than it looks at the http formatted data on port 14501) Dennis Hudson, N2LBT sysop aprsdaly Albany, NY On Feb 29, 2004, at 4:36 PM, Chris Bell wrote: > > Hi, > I successfully ported aprsd to solaris. Is there any interest > in my changes? While I was at it, I also found two bugs. > > The first patch segment fixes the "currently connected users" count, > [my system said -1 users] the second fixes a little/big endian > bug. [no data read from network, httpport returns nothing] > > The solaris support is not clean, I had to hack the makefiles and add > several includes, so needs to be ported to autoconf. If there is any > interest, I could work on that. > > Chris Bell > KD6ZWR > cb...@ju... > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > Index: servers.cpp > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/aprsd/aprsd/src/servers.cpp,v > retrieving revision 1.7 > diff -c -r1.7 servers.cpp > *** servers.cpp 1 Oct 2003 16:58:27 -0000 1.7 > --- servers.cpp 29 Feb 2004 21:12:56 -0000 > *************** > *** 502,508 **** > count++; > > for (int i = 0; i < nIGATES; i++) > ! if (!cpIGATE[i].connected) > count--; > > > --- 505,511 ---- > count++; > > for (int i = 0; i < nIGATES; i++) > ! if (cpIGATE[i].connected) > count--; > > > > *************** > *** 2451,2457 **** > > int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) > { > ! int c; > int i,BytesRead ,timeout; > timespec ts; > > --- 2454,2460 ---- > > int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) > { > ! unsigned char c; > int i,BytesRead ,timeout; > timespec ts; > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Aprsd-devel mailing list > Apr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQEie89v9YHSxGWFcEQKmeACdHpYiM4lvgUxzgP1M6QdusLHKPNMAoOp8 JS5AgykCMfU/+jjSKA9a36i2 =xmQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Dennis H. N. <n2...@n2...> - 2004-03-05 14:58:45
|
I was sucessful patching my aprsd 2.25-15 On Feb 29, 2004, at 4:36 PM, Chris Bell wrote: > > Hi, > I successfully ported aprsd to solaris. Is there any interest > in my changes? While I was at it, I also found two bugs. > > The first patch segment fixes the "currently connected users" count, > [my system said -1 users] the second fixes a little/big endian > bug. [no data read from network, httpport returns nothing] > > The solaris support is not clean, I had to hack the makefiles and add > several includes, so needs to be ported to autoconf. If there is any > interest, I could work on that. > > Chris Bell > KD6ZWR > cb...@ju... > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > Index: servers.cpp > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/aprsd/aprsd/src/servers.cpp,v > retrieving revision 1.7 > diff -c -r1.7 servers.cpp > *** servers.cpp 1 Oct 2003 16:58:27 -0000 1.7 > --- servers.cpp 29 Feb 2004 21:12:56 -0000 > *************** > *** 502,508 **** > count++; > > for (int i = 0; i < nIGATES; i++) > ! if (!cpIGATE[i].connected) > count--; > > > --- 505,511 ---- > count++; > > for (int i = 0; i < nIGATES; i++) > ! if (cpIGATE[i].connected) > count--; > > > > *************** > *** 2451,2457 **** > > int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) > { > ! int c; > int i,BytesRead ,timeout; > timespec ts; > > --- 2454,2460 ---- > > int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) > { > ! unsigned char c; > int i,BytesRead ,timeout; > timespec ts; > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Aprsd-devel mailing list > Apr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel |
From: Chuck B. <cb...@vi...> - 2004-03-01 14:24:49
|
On Sunday 29 February 2004 16:36, Chris Bell wrote: > Hi, > I successfully ported aprsd to solaris. Is there any interest > in my changes? While I was at it, I also found two bugs. Thanks Chris. I'll add this to the cvs tree. If you had to make any major mods to the code to get it to run under Solaris could you forward those as well. Preferrably wrap the code changes in a #ifdef/endif block. -- Chuck Byam Network Engineer University of Virginia Health System 434.982.4426 |
From: Chris B. <cb...@ju...> - 2004-02-29 21:40:35
|
Hi, I successfully ported aprsd to solaris. Is there any interest in my changes? While I was at it, I also found two bugs. The first patch segment fixes the "currently connected users" count, [my system said -1 users] the second fixes a little/big endian bug. [no data read from network, httpport returns nothing] The solaris support is not clean, I had to hack the makefiles and add several includes, so needs to be ported to autoconf. If there is any interest, I could work on that. Chris Bell KD6ZWR cb...@ju... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Index: servers.cpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/aprsd/aprsd/src/servers.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -c -r1.7 servers.cpp *** servers.cpp 1 Oct 2003 16:58:27 -0000 1.7 --- servers.cpp 29 Feb 2004 21:12:56 -0000 *************** *** 502,508 **** count++; for (int i = 0; i < nIGATES; i++) ! if (!cpIGATE[i].connected) count--; --- 505,511 ---- count++; for (int i = 0; i < nIGATES; i++) ! if (cpIGATE[i].connected) count--; *************** *** 2451,2457 **** int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) { ! int c; int i,BytesRead ,timeout; timespec ts; --- 2454,2460 ---- int recvline(int sock, char *buf, int n, int *err,int timeoutMax) { ! unsigned char c; int i,BytesRead ,timeout; timespec ts; ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2003-05-11 04:27:05
|
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 11:11:34PM -0400, vic wrote: > On Saturday 10 May 2003 10:43 pm, you wrote: > > no configure or make files in cvs > what do I do now? Good question. I just struggled with that myself. You'll need autoconf and automake installed. Run: aclocal autoconf automake -a Alas it doesn't seem to compile anyway, missing string.cpp. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |
From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2003-05-11 02:45:31
|
Chuck, The 2.2.5-7 tarball on sf.net is missing rf.cpp and rf.h. They're in CVS though.. any idea why? thanks Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |
From: Dale H. <da...@wa...> - 2002-08-13 14:43:41
|
Try Pete Lovealls page here: http://www.ae5pl.net/html/q.htm On Tuesday 13 August 2002 09:36 am, you wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:25:29AM -0400, Chuck Byam wrote: > > I'm in the process of adding the q construct to the code now. Should be > > done in the next few days, depending on the time I have to devote to it. > > <ignorance>What's the q construct?</ignorance> > > I never saw it discussed much on aprssig. > > Hamish -- Dale Heatherington Web: http://www.wa4dsy.net |
From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2002-08-13 13:36:48
|
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:25:29AM -0400, Chuck Byam wrote: > I'm in the process of adding the q construct to the code now. Should be done > in the next few days, depending on the time I have to devote to it. <ignorance>What's the q construct?</ignorance> I never saw it discussed much on aprssig. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |
From: Chuck B. <cb...@vi...> - 2002-08-11 15:25:36
|
On Saturday 10 August 2002 21:58, Hamish Moffatt wrote: : I'm attempting to gauge what interest remains in aprsd. Currently it : seems that Chuck is running javAPRSsvr instead. Dale is making new 2.1.= 5 : releases instead based off his 2.1.4 code. I'm making minor changes to : the CVS code when I need new features but nothing major. : : : Hamish I'm in the process of adding the q construct to the code now. Should be = done=20 in the next few days, depending on the time I have to devote to it. Chuck |
From: KC7ZRU - T. <kc...@ar...> - 2002-08-11 05:36:59
|
Good points there Hamish... Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Do you mean the two aprsd camps, or aprsd and javAPRSsvr? > Well, originally I meant the two aprsd camps - but yea, knowing what the advantages of each option available is would be nice. I'm sure there are a more than few of us that don't bother or can't read much of the source code - and if it's not commented, wouldn't be able to figure out what's going on under the hood anyway<g>. I am *NOT* suggesting the different options have to market themselves for acceptance, just a feature list so users can choose what's going to work for their intentions. > I think the aprsd groups can all work together. I've been meaning to > look at all of the changes in 2.1.5b8 and port the relevant ones to the > CVS code. > That idea has it's charms. It would be handy for the results of each camp to be consolidated into one 'product'. But to be clear, I do NOT suggest forcing the two camps into one. It's your code guys, your work - what ever is going to work best for you, go for it. All I'm asking for is gaining a better picture of what it is you're doing for us. > I doubt that the Java server has a local TNC interface, or not one that > can use Linux AX.25 sockets anyway. So it can't completely replace > aprsd. > I'm one of those that rely on the TNC serial interface. Many thanks for the continued support for it! > I'm tempted to start work on a new program which supplies ONLY the TNC > interface and has no other hub functionality built-in. Then that program > can be used with any suitable hub program (Java, aprsd, etc). > Sounds like a handy idea. I know the xastir folks have been thinking of breaking xastir up into 'block' units as well. Could allow for a LOT of options not yet even considered. > One thing I notice with the CVS work on aprsd over the past year is that > since most of the aprsd developers don't use the TNC interface, it's the > part that gets broken the most (and I spend most of my aprsd time repairing > it). Again, thanks for fixing it for us 'non-coder' types. I've very much enjoyed running aprsd. It's the whole reason I became interested in LINUX at all. Then I found xastir, apache, php, mysql.... > Hamish -- Casper, WY | CARC Repeater DN62tt | 146.940 "The Dungeon" online at http://go.to/kc7zru "RTFM" is NOT a 'four letter' word! |
From: Bill V. - W. <wa...@ya...> - 2002-08-11 04:38:19
|
At 11:58 AM 8/11/02 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >I'm attempting to gauge what interest remains in aprsd. Currently it >seems that Chuck is running javAPRSsvr instead. Dale is making new 2.1.5 >releases instead based off his 2.1.4 code. I'm making minor changes to >the CVS code when I need new features but nothing major. I've been playing with getting my tweaks applied to the CVS version. I tried Dales new version today but it appears it doesn't use the AX25 code which, IMHO, severely limits it. Don't shut down the project yet... Bill, WA7NWP |
From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2002-08-11 02:26:22
|
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 08:11:56PM -0600, KC7ZRU - Tate wrote: > What would *REALLY* help is for the two 'camps' to share what their > features, positives and problems, design goals and thinking are. It > would help the community a LOT to understand what each of the two > flavors is doing, what's working, what's not - what's planned... Do you mean the two aprsd camps, or aprsd and javAPRSsvr? I think the aprsd groups can all work together. I've been meaning to look at all of the changes in 2.1.5b8 and port the relevant ones to the CVS code. > Is there hope for aprsd to continue being part of the APRS-IS? Should we > all just abandon it now and get the Java server running? What's the > consensus? I doubt that the Java server has a local TNC interface, or not one that can use Linux AX.25 sockets anyway. So it can't completely replace aprsd. I'm tempted to start work on a new program which supplies ONLY the TNC interface and has no other hub functionality built-in. Then that program can be used with any suitable hub program (Java, aprsd, etc). One thing I notice with the CVS work on aprsd over the past year is that since most of the aprsd developers don't use the TNC interface, it's the part that gets broken the most (and I spend most of my aprsd time repairing it). Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |
From: KC7ZRU - T. <kc...@ar...> - 2002-08-11 02:12:06
|
Hamish, I'm currently running two copies of the CVS 2.2.3 here. One is a 'public' server (aprsdcsp.rmaprs.org) and the other is a semi-private low bandwidth server for some special applications. I'm planning to migrate to Dale's latest release (2.1.5B8) since it "seems" to be the most active development right now and I'm curious to know just what's been going on. Don't know yet what I'll end up using in the long run. What would *REALLY* help is for the two 'camps' to share what their features, positives and problems, design goals and thinking are. It would help the community a LOT to understand what each of the two flavors is doing, what's working, what's not - what's planned... Is there hope for aprsd to continue being part of the APRS-IS? Should we all just abandon it now and get the Java server running? What's the consensus? Those kinds of things Just my 2 hundredth's of a dollar's worth 73 Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > I'm attempting to gauge what interest remains in aprsd. Currently it > seems that Chuck is running javAPRSsvr instead. Dale is making new 2.1.5 > releases instead based off his 2.1.4 code. I'm making minor changes to > the CVS code when I need new features but nothing major. > > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Aprsd-devel mailing list > Apr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel -- Casper, WY | CARC Repeater DN62tt | 146.940 "The Dungeon" online at http://go.to/kc7zru "RTFM" is NOT a 'four letter' word! |
From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2002-08-11 01:58:46
|
I'm attempting to gauge what interest remains in aprsd. Currently it seems that Chuck is running javAPRSsvr instead. Dale is making new 2.1.5 releases instead based off his 2.1.4 code. I'm making minor changes to the CVS code when I need new features but nothing major. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |
From: Dale H. <da...@wa...> - 2002-05-21 18:06:12
|
Funny you should bring this up. About 2 hours ago I removed system status messages from ports 1313 and 1314 on aprsd215b1 (not yet available for download) This removes the javaMSG stuff from the Link ports. It's simple to change the source of aprsd.cpp. Here is the section where I commected out or removed "srcSYSTEM" from the EchoMask. if(cmd.compare("LINKPORT") == 0) //provides local TNC data + logged on users { spLinkServer.ServerPort = atoi(token[1].c_str()); spLinkServer.EchoMask = srcUSERVALID + srcUSER + srcTNC + srcUDP //+ srcSYSTEM //System messages removed from link port v.215 ; n = 1; } if(cmd.compare("MSGPORT") == 0) //System messages removed from msgport port v.215 { spMsgServer.ServerPort = atoi(token[1].c_str()); spMsgServer.EchoMask = src3RDPARTY ; n = 1; } On Tuesday 21 May 2002 11:48 am, KC7ZRU - Tate wrote: > I've had the honor of having one of the new JavAPRSSrvrs connecting up > here. Couple observations and maybe something that needs to be reacted > to: > > JavAPRSSrvr has an inactivity timer - default setting is 20 seconds and > is user definable. > > JavAPRSSrvr will drop a connection if there's no traffic flowing and > re-establish it later on as needed. However, each of these > connect/disconnects generates a USERLIST message that's sent out to the > APRS-IS. With a low volume server and a 20 second 'time out', the sheer > volume of these messages is pretty impressive. > > I've got 'broadcastJavaInfo off' in aprsd.conf - but these are still > getting out. (does that even apply? does it still work?) > > Is there a way to kill these messages altogether? Does it exist and > isn't working or is something broken? Does this need to be added in? > > Time to kill the USERLIST messages, I say. > > Examples available: > > http://12.227.198.57/aprsd.log <- aprsdCSP's May 18 to current > > http://12.227.198.57/20020519.txt (or .zip - both there) <-log file a > client connected up to another server (port 1314), connected to aprsdCSP > via port 1313 recorded. (SANAE - port 1314 -> 'other server' - port 1313 > -> aprsdCSP) > > aprsd 2.2.3 from CVS about 3 weeks ago > > 73 -- Dale Heatherington Web Page http://www.wa4dsy.net Sent by KMail for Linux |
From: KC7ZRU - T. <kc...@ar...> - 2002-05-21 15:49:04
|
I've had the honor of having one of the new JavAPRSSrvrs connecting up here. Couple observations and maybe something that needs to be reacted to: JavAPRSSrvr has an inactivity timer - default setting is 20 seconds and is user definable. JavAPRSSrvr will drop a connection if there's no traffic flowing and re-establish it later on as needed. However, each of these connect/disconnects generates a USERLIST message that's sent out to the APRS-IS. With a low volume server and a 20 second 'time out', the sheer volume of these messages is pretty impressive. I've got 'broadcastJavaInfo off' in aprsd.conf - but these are still getting out. (does that even apply? does it still work?) Is there a way to kill these messages altogether? Does it exist and isn't working or is something broken? Does this need to be added in? Time to kill the USERLIST messages, I say. Examples available: http://12.227.198.57/aprsd.log <- aprsdCSP's May 18 to current http://12.227.198.57/20020519.txt (or .zip - both there) <-log file a client connected up to another server (port 1314), connected to aprsdCSP via port 1313 recorded. (SANAE - port 1314 -> 'other server' - port 1313 -> aprsdCSP) aprsd 2.2.3 from CVS about 3 weeks ago 73 -- Casper, WY | CARC Repeater DN62tt | 146.940 "The Dungeon" online at http://go.to/kc7zru "RTFM" is NOT a 'four letter' word! |