From: Andrew S. <an...@st...> - 2002-04-05 08:01:24
|
After several hours it segfaulted again, no core dump but the strace output looks intriguing: nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL) = 0 read(0, "", 1024) = 0 time(NULL) = 1017985561 write(2, "** No data from TNC during previ"..., 48** No data from TNC during previous 2 minutes **) = 48 write(2, "\n", 1 ) = 1 time([1017985561]) = 1017985561 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0 rt_sigsuspend([] <unfinished ...> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hamish Moffatt" <ha...@cl...> To: <apr...@li...> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:24 PM Subject: Re: [Aprsd-users] aprsd permanent disonnect/connect > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:04:34PM +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > > Something else I have noticed the timeouts seem to be a little intolerant - > > > > Thu Apr 4 15:42:48 2002 Connected to first.aprs.net 23 > > Thu Apr 4 15:42:49 2002 Disconnected first.aprs.net 23 > > Thu Apr 4 15:43:50 2002 Connected to second.aprs.net 23 > > Thu Apr 4 15:57:14 2002 Disconnected second.aprs.net 23 > > Thu Apr 4 15:58:15 2002 Connected to third.aprs.net 23 (down ??) > > Thu Apr 4 15:58:16 2002 Disconnected third.aprs.net 23 > > Thu Apr 4 15:59:16 2002 Connected to ahubca.net 2023 > > > > first and secod were still both reachable from my server when the switch > > happened. > > Do you mean that you could ping them? If their services (aprsd and APRServe) > crashed or were restarted, your connection would be dropped even though > you could still ping, for example. > > I have noticed it switching hosts a lot here though. > > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> > > _______________________________________________ > Aprsd-users mailing list > Apr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-users > |