From: Hamish M. <ha...@cl...> - 2001-11-11 12:31:20
|
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:08:20PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Also, our limits for some other types appear to be incorrect: > > ';' packets: I count 77 according to the spec, we allow 87. > Or does ';' include timestamps? Add another 7 for those. > The SPEC seems to be a bit vague about which IDs have timestamps > and which don't. Oops, I had an old draft version of the spec. 87 is fine, should be 89 with CR/LF. > '>' packets; spec says 63, code allows 70. This still stands. I've attached a patch for review. Admittedly this clashes with Brian's work. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...> |