From: Francis T. <ft...@pr...> - 2010-04-23 14:28:47
|
El dv 23 de 04 de 2010 a les 16:24 +0200, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va escriure: > Hi, > > I thought I should mention this bug (or, these bugs?) > > http://bugs.apertium.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 > > on the mailing list since it can introduce a hang in lt-proc. > > > I came across it while messing around with an XSLT to remove certain > <e>'s from pardefs. > > The first issue reported there is odd but not critical; you can get > spurious analyses if you have a pardef calling two pardefs, where the > last one has only a single, empty <e>. > > The second issue, however, can lead to hangs. Neither lt-proc nor > lt-comp nor validation reports anything here (so watch out if you have > empty elements like this). > It's worth noting that this happens with both lttoolbox and lttoolbox-java. Fran |