[Apcupsd-users] REPLACEBATT asserted despite normal charge and runtime estimate on Smart-UPS SMC100
Brought to you by:
adk0212
|
From: David R. <dav...@gm...> - 2025-12-23 04:45:44
|
Hello all, I am running apcupsd 3.14.14 on Rocky Linux, monitoring an APC Smart-UPS SMC1000C via USB. Recently, apcupsd began reporting: STATUS : ONLINE REPLACEBATT BCHARGE : 98.0 Percent TIMELEFT : 21.0 Minutes BATTV : 27.0 Volts There has not been a recent real power outage, at least not within the last month. Battery voltage appears nominal for a 24V system, and the reported runtime estimate remains relatively high. The UPS manufacturing date, as reported on the unit label, is 2023. To the best of my knowledge, these are the original batteries that shipped with the UPS, which would make them approximately two years old. I have been using APC Smart-UPS units for many years and have not seen this alert before. In the past, I typically replaced batteries only after observing a clear history of declining runtime under load. My questions are: 1. What exact condition causes apcupsd to assert REPLACEBATT on Smart-UPS models? 2. Is this flag driven primarily by internal battery age counters, impedance tests, self-test results, or voltage behavior under load? 3. Is it expected for REPLACEBATT to appear even when TIMELEFT remains strong? 4. Are there any apcupsd diagnostics beyond the standard status fields that help distinguish an age-based warning from actual capacity degradation? For reference, I intend to order a genuine APC APCRBC142 replacement battery cartridge, but I wanted to better understand the logic behind this flag and how apcupsd interprets it. Best regards, David Roth |