in line 820 (for verhulst2015) and also few lines later (for verhulst2018), the afb_flags are being used with inconsistent parameters, including 'no_v' and 'v' within the list of input parameters. LTFAT then sets 'v' to 1 and 'no_v' to 0, i.e., for options of the same flag, LTFAT will take the last specified option. I think we should not adopt this approach. I am returning the "code back" to my (Alejandro's) version, where 'no_v' is actually located and replaced.
Another styling edit: I am removing three lines of commented text near line 4232. The comments are no longer valid, the comments are without indentation, i.e., the % symbols are not at the indentation level of the code.
