From: Daniel A. S. <st...@ic...> - 2003-09-30 15:35:48
|
On Wednesday, Oct 1, 2003, at 01:06 Australia/Sydney, Fr=E9d=E9ric=20 Boulanger wrote: > So AlphaX is 20 times slower than AlphaTk for this task. that's outdated info given my latest figures... with my naive=20 optimization mentioned earlier, on my 1Ghz G4 eMac =ABAlpha8.0b12=BB time {help::mimicHelpMenu "Tcl 8.4 = Commands.txt"} 15388525 microseconds per iteration =ABAlphatk8.3b4=BB time {help::mimicHelpMenu "Tcl 8.4 = Commands.txt"} 21132977 microseconds per iteration so AlphaX is already 1.4 times faster with the simplest optimization &=20= we should be able to improve on this significantly Cheers, Daniel --=20 ** Daniel A. Steffen ** "And now for something completely ** Dept. of Mathematics ** different" Monty Python ** Macquarie University ** <mailto:st...@ma...> ** NSW 2109 Australia ** <http://www.maths.mq.edu.au/~steffen/> |