From: Asko K. <ask...@sc...> - 2004-09-01 17:51:48
|
Thanks for the cont'd mail, Rod. Yes, it starts to make sense, and possibly allows for a lot less bloat than the current alternatives have. One correction on Lua, though: you don't need it installed on the development machine. It's just ANSI C code, so you can have it in a 'lua5/' subdir or something, and compile alongside the rest of the code. Just like expat. :) -ak 1.9.2004 kello 19:24, HERNANDEZ CORDOBA RODRIGO JOSE kirjoitti: >> Still, you could embed a whole Lua5 engine in about 100k of >> binary, >>> running the upper level tasks for you. This is a bit similar as >> what >>> Apple's done with use of ObjectiveC in their Cocoa framework, but >> lighter.> > > Oh I wouldnt embed Lua inside the core, as that would require Lua to be > installed in order to compile it, but Lua bindings I can envision. |