Browse free open source Tunneling software and projects below. Use the toggles on the left to filter open source Tunneling software by OS, license, language, programming language, and project status.
A modern GUI client based on Tauri
Amnezia VPN Client (Desktop+Mobile)
Official ProtonVPN Windows app
AmneziaWG client for Windows
Qt based cross-platform GUI proxy configuration manager
An automated phishing tool with 30+ templates
DNS to SOCKS or HTTP proxy
A rule-based tunnel for Android
Cloudflare Tunnel Client
Unified ingress for developers
Windows GUI client application built on the Clash core proxy engine
Android VPN client with DNS tunneling (DNSTT, NoizDNS & Slipstream)
Encrypted UDP based FTP with multicast
Now continued as OculiX — see oculix.org
Mobile counterpart to desktop Clash clients for Android
A simple & beautiful GUI application for scrcpy
An application for iOS and for macOs
A faster, better and more stable Redis desktop manager
tun2socks , powered by gVisor TCP/IP stack
FOSS WireGuard & AmneziaWG Android client with auto-tunneling
WinDivert: Windows Packet Divert
Android GUI for AmneziaWG
Lightweight cross-platform desktop client for managing Mihomo proxies
Open source tunneling software allows developers and system administrators to securely expose local services to the internet or connect systems across separate networks without complex manual network configuration. This software creates a secure pathway, or tunnel, between two points, making it possible to share a local development server, access an internal system remotely, or bypass restrictive network setups like firewalls or NAT without opening ports directly.
Because the underlying code is publicly available, teams can inspect exactly how traffic is routed and secured, self-host the tunneling infrastructure, and customize behavior to fit specific technical requirements. This transparency is especially valued by teams with strict security or compliance needs who want full visibility into how their traffic is being handled.
This software is commonly used by developers testing webhooks, sharing local development environments, and connecting distributed systems that need to communicate securely across different networks. As remote development and distributed infrastructure continue to grow, more technical teams are turning to open source tunneling tools for a transparent, self-controlled alternative to closed commercial services.
Because this software is open source, there is typically no direct licensing cost for the core tool itself, though organizations should expect real costs tied to hosting a self-managed relay server and the engineering time required for setup and ongoing maintenance. Running tunneling infrastructure reliably at scale can require meaningful server resources, particularly for teams handling significant traffic volume.
Some hosted or managed versions built on top of open source tunneling tools may charge for additional convenience, such as managed relay servers or advanced traffic features. Organizations relying entirely on self-hosted, fully open source setups should budget primarily for infrastructure and the technical time needed to configure and maintain the system properly.
These tools commonly connect with local development environments, allowing developers to expose a running application directly from their machine. Webhook-dependent services are a frequent integration point as well, since tunneling is often used specifically to test how external platforms send data to a local endpoint. CI/CD pipelines sometimes integrate too, using tunnels to expose temporary testing environments during automated workflows. Reverse proxy and load balancing tools are another common pairing, particularly for more advanced self-hosted deployments.
Choosing the right tool starts with identifying the specific protocols you need to support, since some tools focus narrowly on HTTP traffic while others handle a broader range of connection types. Buyers should consider whether a self-hosted relay server fits their technical resources and security requirements, or whether a shared public relay is acceptable for their use case. It is worth evaluating how active the surrounding open source community is, since ongoing support and updates often come from that community rather than a dedicated vendor. Ease of setup matters as well, particularly for teams that need a quick, temporary solution rather than a permanently configured system. Finally, consider how well the tool supports debugging and traffic inspection, since this can significantly affect how useful it is during actual development work.