orbitcowboy

Thanks! A ticket was created here: https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/11668

Cppcheck uses pcre currently.

It should be detected here: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/blob/cee04f4ee57a9e336755ed1b943c7e88fc8a8ca5/tools/donate_cpu_lib.py#L638

Mhhh, we have already a configuration for this macro https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/blob/f0ac0d891024738cf55f2ba01e9a77cac1807ca0/cfg/gtk.cfg#L179 Why do we get a syntax error?

Mhh,h we have already a configuration for this macro https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/blob/f0ac0d891024738cf55f2ba01e9a77cac1807ca0/cfg/gtk.cfg#L179 Why do we get a syntax error?

It's a good idea to release the new version in early January from my side. On my Christmas wish list there are two MISRA-FPs to fixed before the release :-) misra-c2012-8.4 misra-c2012-10.4

Thanks Daniel. The only issue that bothers me at the moment is a misra.py bailout, described here: https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/10481 But I don't know if its worth to delay the release. It's up to you...

Did you use " --library=posix", at commandline? It should provide information of fdopen to Cppcheck.