Robert Stayton

This issue has been transfered to Github as issue #108 https://github.com/docbook/xslt10-stylesheets/issues/108

Sorry for the delay in responding to this problem. I'm fixing bugs now, but I am unable to duplicate your problem. When I run your make process on your files, the resulting epub passes epubcheck. Your zip file did not include your OEBPS directory, so I could not compare my output to yours. Also, did you use a catalog file to map the XSL to a local directory, and which version of the stylesheets was that?

DocBook XSL development moved to Github

Sorry, I got two bug reports mixed up. Your's is on the right list. I intend to fix a bunch of bugs like this during this month. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net On 1/10/2018 1:01 PM, Stefan Sauer wrote: Did I report this on the wrong list? If you are talking about a different report, do you have a link? [bugs:#1401] https://sourceforge.net/p/docbook/bugs/1401/ Not all index files are generated Status: open Group: output: HTML Created: Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:55 AM UTC by Stefan Sauer...

Nothing had yet been done on this issue because it was reported on the issues list for the docbook schemas, not the stylesheets. So I asked the reporter to repost it to the stylesheet issues list. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises bobs@sagehill.net On 1/10/2018 11:11 AM, Stefan Sauer wrote: Ping? Anything I can help to test? [bugs:#1401] https://sourceforge.net/p/docbook/bugs/1401/ Not all index files are generated Status: open Group: output: HTML Created: Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:55 AM UTC by Stefan Sauer...

So I can test this, can you post as an attachment the assembled index XML files that are not being processed? I have downloaded the gspell-docs.xml.in file from the github site, but apparently the index files are generated.

I would suggest you go back to 1.79.1 for now. The 1.79.2 version is built from the same source files using a somewhat different process to confirm that the new process worked. It should be functionally equivalent to 1.79.1, but obviously not in this case. I will investigate this issue.

Thanks for pointing this out. On first examination it appeared as if the FO output...