Menu

#214 Check for "fubared" gcc is misguided

closed-wont-fix
nobody
None
5
2001-03-30
2001-03-27
No

It actually breaks compiling altogether, because the
old egcs (kgcc) on Red Hat doesn't work with the
"-march=k6" switch.
The current gcc (from 7.0 updates or from beta/raw
hide) actually works very well, and all that the
current "configure" script does is screw up.
Even more annoying is that you've broken "CC=gcc
./configure ..." too, so I can't override it. I
consider this a bug in the current build system for
quakeforge. I have a uquake-glx from the "old" tree
built with RH gcc-2.96 that works quite happily, so I
am fairly sure that the test you have in place is both
heavy-handed and in many cases unnecessary. If you
must, at least check to see if it the original
RH7.0-shipped compiler, rather than completely failing
for those of us with more recent versions, please?

Sorry to rant, but I actually find RH7.x very usable, I
have had no major problems compiling anything, I have
working DRI-accelerated 3D graphics, UT and Q3A work,
quakeforge (oldtree) works a treat, and I would like to
test the current quakeforge with it.

Discussion

  • Bill Currie

    Bill Currie - 2001-03-30
    • summary: Check for "fubared" gcc is misguided --> Check for "fubared" gcc is misguided
    • status: open --> closed-wont-fix
     
  • Bill Currie

    Bill Currie - 2001-03-30

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=2761

    THIS IS NOT A BUG!

    The disabling of gcc-2.96 was NOT done lightly. It produces
    broken code for quakeforge and has thus been banned (most
    noticable in the server). gcc-2.95.4 (even though it's not
    an official release), available from rh's contrib section,
    is reported to work well.

     
  • Bill Crawford

    Bill Crawford - 2001-03-30
    • summary: Check for "fubared" gcc is misguided --> Check for "fubared" gcc is misguided
     
  • Bill Crawford

    Bill Crawford - 2001-03-30

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=14762

    Can you point me to an example (please) because I really am
    surprised by this ... I have the old tree built and working
    fine, giving me quite impressive FPS with my G400. It's one
    of my test cases :)

    Has this been reported to Red Hat yet?

     

Log in to post a comment.