User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
3
0
0
0
1
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 0 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • Not bad. Recompiled it recently under a 64-Bit FC13 setup. Still runs good but can run better. Wish it was updated though.
  • I really want to see how much faster this runs in fedora on a 3GHz quad with 4GB of RAM compared to how it used to be in win95 on a pentium 166MHz with 64MB. Looks like the TekNap frontend is still available, too. :-]
  • Thanks for restoring the site, Drogoh! Wayne Defacer can go trash his own files and leave this stuff ALONE.
  • How did this guy hijack the OpenNap project??? I am SO pissed off that he's removed years of historical data - from an OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE project!!! I come here regularly to review the old changelogs, replace any files I have misplaced, etc. OpenNap was never shut down - Napster was. Why didn't he start his own fork or project like others have done (OpenNap NG; anap, SlavaNap etc) instead of stealing this important body of work - and shame on you, SourceForge, for allowing this malicious takeover! By the way, the client list is now gone, although I know a lot of those clients that were there still work and are in use. Now he only lists WinMX (ugh) and SlavaNap (which is a napster protocol SERVER, not CLIENT). Protection for copyrighted files already existed - it was called a BLOCK list, and came with quite a few artists already blocked. Where was this guy 10 years ago when drscholl wrote the REAL OpenNap?
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next