FileVerifier++ is a Windows utility for calculating hashes using a number of algorithms including CRC32, MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256/224/384/512, WHIRLPOOL, and RIPEMD-128/160/256/320. Supported hash file formats include MD5SUM .MD5, SFV, BSD CKSUM, and others.
License
GNU General Public License version 2.0 (GPLv2)Follow FileVerifier++
You Might Also Like
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) on Microsoft Azure provides a secure, reliable, and flexible foundation for your cloud infrastructure. Red Hat Enterprise Linux on Microsoft Azure is ideal for enterprises seeking to enhance their cloud environment with seamless integration, consistent performance, and comprehensive support.
Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project
User Reviews
-
Thank you very much for the program! Special thanks for distributing it under such a license!
-
The wealth of supported hashing algorithms is a blessing. But its user interface is certainly its weak spot. It does not support verifying against a manually hash. Phrases like "actual hash value" and "valid hash value" are confusing to no end. (Which one is the calculated hash value and which one is the presumed/given value?)
-
Works great, did what I needed it to. I was looking everywhere for a program that would do batch operations and automatically verify each file against a file of the same name with '.md5' added to the end. I finally found this one, which can do that through the command line utility, and it also goes through subdirectories recursively, so I was able to verify 40-odd files in 6 directories all in one go. Thanks!
-
Fileverifier is great! Thanks.
-
good file verify and comparison, and bad for lack of maintenance, I recently got bad block on one of my mirror base backup, which over 2T and 1,000,000 files so I took a shot trying to find out which file have been affected by bad blocks that filesystem won't tell me, after few run, it crashed if encounter too many locked file, after I get rid of antivirus software that lock file, it failed to save result even after a successful execution, I have already tried both 32/64 bits version, so, it's buggy if you wanna do it under a larger scale,