From: Oren Ben-K. <or...@ri...> - 2002-05-07 20:55:23
|
Brian Ingerson wrote: > I certainly don't want to hold up any progress with my rather specific > needs for Perl. The reason I didn't concede this point earlier is that I > suspected it might be a red herring on Oren's part, and I wanted to see > all the issues delved deeply. I think we have a lot more out in the open > now. Ur, I think it was Clark who first spotted the problem. I admit I'm the chief trouble-maker at this point, however :-) > So, regardless of whether we need them or not, I want to propose the > following list of types for Perl data: > ... > What I need to know from you, Oren (or Clark), is if all the above URIs > are valid. From a glance at the productions in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt they seem to be. Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki |