From: Clark C . E. <cc...@cl...> - 2001-08-09 11:16:40
|
| > This is unnecessarily strict; the production allows the | > indentation, but doesn't require it. This doesn't cause | > any ambiguities, even if we use an empty line to separate | > sections, because a section break is an empty line followed | > by a zero-indentation node (as you have pointed out - thanks!). | | Not quite. I said "usually". There is an edge case: | | foo: multiline with | trailing newlines | | | bar: second key, same map | | Perhaps Clark's new requirement/wish of multilines requiring quotes | takes care of this though: | | foo: 'multiline with | trailing newlines | | ' | bar: second key, same map I think I could go either way. The former is much more readable. But I would just hate if we had editors which stripped spaces messing things up! I guess we can use " " for the default serialization mechanism for some of these cases, no? Best, Clark |