From: Clark C . E. <cc...@cl...> - 2001-05-19 19:39:28
|
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:25:18PM -0700, Brian Ingerson wrote: | As a note of interest, Jeff Hobbs asserted that "" was superior to \" | because you could parse forward and backwards the same way. But his | model did not include folded whitespace, \n, etc. I think \" is fine for | our purposes. Yes, that is neat, but we have to worry about \n and its pals. Also, \" is familar to most programmers. | I'm in favor. I didn't really see the purpose of the intermittent | non-folding rule anyways. '\ ' or '\s' is fine for this. good deal. | | BTW, Do we support \x05 style escaping in streams. | I wouldn't mind. Might be useful. Yes, of course! | PS I feel like we are getting somewhere again. Yep. The syntax has very much taken shape unless someone finds a monkey-wrench. I'm starting to work on the specification -- and I will first post an outline and then I'll start heading for the first draft in the next 4 hours (at 8 I have mandatory, externally imposed social time... as if this isn't social... *grin*) ... On a related topic, I'd be interested in what you think about class names? Best, Clark |