Re: [Yaml-core] libyaml futures

[Chris R. <cro...@di...>]

On Aug 26, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Kirill Simonov wrote:
> Logging should be easy and natural with libyaml.  Parsing a config  
> file,
> on the other hand, will require you to write more code.  I guess I  
> need
> to add few examples illustrating common problems like logging and
> configuration.

   That would be nice. :-)  And yes, I see that a config file  
interface will
require some more code.  Sadly, that's the part I need to do first, not
the logging.

   I expect I'll just write a small module that can be compiled into my
programs that will read the YAML config file into some sort of structure
in memory, then allow me to query it for tags/symbols/values.  If
you have any architechtural suggestions, please feel free to contribute
them.  The closer it is to being able to be reused by you, the better
for me in the long run.  :-)

> The main difference between 1.0 and 1.1 is the tag syntax, which is
> mostly important for object serialization/deserialization, but for
> logging and configuration you may probably ignore it.

   Right.  I was hoping to ignore everything I can for a while.  :-)
Thanks for that note, tho, that helps me know what I'm looking
at.

                                  - Chris