From: Oren Ben-K. <or...@be...> - 2004-09-12 05:17:46
|
On Sunday 12 September 2004 00:53, trans. (T. Onoma) wrote: > Don't like double defs. What if I want no-specific but not prefix? First, I don't see this as a problem in practice. Why would anyone ever want to define !foo! without also defining !foo!bar? I can't imagine a scenario when that would be useful. But, suppose you do... just write: %TAG !foo! ? what-!foo!-means --- - !foo! # what-!foo!-means - !foo!bar # ?bar - neither private nor global error ... Remember, a cooked tag must either start with a '!' or be a valid URI. So here you explicitly said that you can't suffix !foo!. Problem solved! I like this proposal. Nice job, Clark. Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki |