From: why t. l. s. <yam...@wh...> - 2004-09-03 21:46:04
|
T. Onoma wrote: >On Friday 03 September 2004 04:43 pm, Clark C. Evans wrote: > > >>Really, this is 1.2 as we >> should have bumped the version when we got rid of default implicit >> typing... let's not make the same mistake twice. >> >> > >Okay, I wasn't around for this. So implicit typing is gone already? Just >hasn't caught up to my version of Syck yet? Is that what I'm hearing? > > _default_ implicit typing is gone, t. emancipation of types, courtesy of ole abe ingy. look, we're only trying to sensibly turn the shortcut syntax into a clash-free environment for the external types. i don't see why builtin types and user's private types can't share the generic namespace. ruby's default namespace contains both builtin and user-made classes. _why |