From: Tim H. <tim...@co...> - 2004-04-30 18:07:59
|
Clark C. Evans wrote: >Tim, > >PyYaml has not seen an update in over a year. I've been using >the python binding in the syck distribution for the last six >months (_why did a great job). Since syck didn't have any dumping >code a few months back, I stripped the dumping code from PyYaml >and put it into syck's python extension, 'ydump'. It isn't the >best solution, but it works. > > Thanks Clark. I guess I'd better check out Syck -- I've been trying to keep with a pure Python solution, to keep the number of extension I have to keep around down a bit, but no sense fighting the tides of history and all that. You wouldn't happen to have any hints on getting libsyck to compile on Windows would you? As far as I know configure doesn't work there. Or am I just being obtuse? Thanks, -tim >Best, > >Clark > >On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 09:43:37AM -0700, Tim Hochberg wrote: >| >| I recently found a bug or something fairly bug-like in PyYaml 0.31 and >| 0.32. I looked at the download page at yaml.org, but all of the links to >| PyYaml appear to be broken. What is the status of PyYaml, is it still >| being maintained? Is it in limbo till the spec gets finalized? >| >| Anyway the bugish behavior is that PyYaml write the booleans True/False >| as True and False, but then naturally enough reads them as "True" and >| "False". I admit to being lazy and not having read the spec, so I'm not >| sure what the correct behavior should be here, but I suspect it's >| something different. >| >| Thanks, >| >| -tim >| >| >| >| ------------------------------------------------------- >| This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >| Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >| Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >| http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >| _______________________________________________ >| Yaml-core mailing list >| Yam...@li... >| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core > > > |