From: Brian I. <in...@tt...> - 2004-01-19 21:11:00
|
On 19/01/04 12:55 +1300, Sam Vilain wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:40, Sean O'Dell wrote; > > > > There's a Context Free Grammar for it: > > > http://www.yaml.org/spec/#.Syntax > > I meant a specification for a YAML schema, not the YAML specification. > Brian, Oren and Clark are meeting in Portland OR this weekend for 6 days of YAML planning. Our primary objective will be to finalize the YAML Specification content. A secondary goal will be to make good progress on a YAML Schema language. Cheers, Brian > Oh, right. As in, a standard for specifying a YAML structure that > validates data YAML documents. Now we're on the same wavelength. > > I think it would be a mistake to make such a specification YAML > specific. Rather, have a look at Andy Wardley's schema work - see if > you can serialise those structures via YAML, and use them to drive the > validation of the data structure that YAML deserialises. That would > make for a very terse specification and very clean implementation of > the validator. > -- > Sam Vilain, sa...@vi... > > The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the > way its animals are treated. > -- Mahatma Gandhi > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Yaml-core mailing list > Yam...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yaml-core |