From: Peter W. <pwo...@qu...> - 2003-09-25 17:33:18
|
| | I'd like to use YAML as a persistence mechanism for an | | internal project that I'm working on, but since this | | project may one day be used in a production environment | | ... | | I use _why's Syck module in production. =20 That's good to know. But given the current state of YAML development (and the fact that _why seems surprised by your note!) I think I'll go for data persistence via the XML::Simple package in my prototype and switch to YAML when I can point to a manager-friendly announcement on yaml.org re version X (> 1.0) of a reference implementation. | | As far as I can tell, the YAML 1.0 specification isn't | | even finalized, yet (the working draft on www.yaml.org | | is dated March 15, 2003) | | This weekend I'll be working on making it a release canidate, | we really expect very very little change now. Great! This is also good to know. | | Does anyone on this list have any recommendations, or | | will I have to (shudder) go with an XML-based solution? | | I use XML as well (so I can use XSLT->HTML transformations), | I do this mostly with the rules outlined at: | http://yaml.org/xml.html Another great resource. Thanks again. Peter |