RE: [Yaml-core] Top level scalars (in detail)

[Oren Ben-K. <or...@be...>]

Brian Ingerson wrote:
> > However, it would certainly be easier to *add* single-scalar 
> > capability later than to remove it later, because making the parser 
> > more lenient does not break backward compatibility.
> 
> +1
> 
> I would say that that seals it. If we see people trying to 
> break the rules for some special use case down the road, I'd 
> be much more inclined to relax to rules.

Hmmm. OK. I'll just do a quick fix to the spec to allow for the
header-less flow collection styles, and the other minor glitches we have
in the current spec.

Have fun,

	Oren Ben-Kiki