Re: [xwax-devel] Release candidate 0.4rc1
Brought to you by:
hills
From: Mark H. <ma...@po...> - 2008-04-19 10:36:23
|
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Kyriakos Bellios wrote: >> Can you try reversing the values for POLARITY_ in timecoder.c, and let >> me know if that is an improvement? >> >> Mark >> >> >> diff --git a/timecoder.c b/timecoder.c >> index b4caccf..0dabd39 100644 >> --- a/timecoder.c >> +++ b/timecoder.c >> @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ >> /* Timecode definitions */ >> >> >> -#define POLARITY_NEGATIVE 0 >> -#define POLARITY_POSITIVE 1 >> +#define POLARITY_NEGATIVE 1 >> +#define POLARITY_POSITIVE 0 >> >> struct timecode_def_t { >> char *name, *desc; > > Unfortunately reversing POLARITY values make no difference. > The problem exists only in fast back spins. Okay, that rules out what I thought it might be. Can you check whether v0.3 successfully tracks the vinyl when you do the same thing? Mark |