From: Heiko S. <hsc...@ft...> - 2001-11-08 16:33:55
|
Hey everyone, On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Harm van der Heijden wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:46:16PM +0100, Guenter Bartsch wrote: > > OK, but how is your current position on adding the C++ library as-is? I just > took a look at the DirectShow code and I really wouldn't want to have those > 4013 lines of C++ converted to plain C. I don't see any objection to C++ as > the target audience is well defined (i.e. x86). Adding the artificial > constraint of requiring GNU C++ and setting up configure so that it only > compiles that lib for x86 GNU C++ platforms should break nothing. i am not planning to work on the wine code, so i surely can't say how it must be done... but i've got one more thought that would probably be in favor of doing pure c - gcc is probably _not_ the only interesting compiler for x86. i hope to get a chance to try out intel's compiler, which (at least in some cases) is supposed to produce much faster code. cheers, Heiko |