Re: [xine-devel] sdl - do we need it?

[Daniel Caujolle-B. <lo...@cl...>]

Hi Guenter,

Guenter Bartsch wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> as you may've read in my previous posting, Paul's downmixing code performs
> very well so we'll have it in our next release (either with the new libac3
> if I get it to work / come to the conclusion it's good enough or with
> the old libac3).
> 
> Now, my question is: do we still need sdl? I know that especially Daniel
> put some work in integrating it in our build process and it's always a bad
> thing to throw your work away, but on the other hand I don't see any
> reason why we want to keep it in - or am I missing something here, does it
> buy us anything else apart from downmixing audio?

	I donno if we should or not, but i'll certainly not be 
offuscated as well, don't worry ;-) 

	"faire et defaire c'est toujours travailler" (French in text).

Cheers.
-- 
73's de Daniel, F1RMB.

              -=- Daniel Caujolle-Bert -=- lo...@cl... -=-
                        -=- f1...@f1... (AMPR NET) -=-