From: Barry S. <bar...@on...> - 2006-04-10 16:43:12
|
Michael Roitzsch wrote: > Hi, > >>> Subversion works well, is scriptable, has lots of tools built on top >>> of it and is understood by a large community of users. >> >> and it's been online for a while at SF... >> >> I myself have registered for it recently (my own project) (when dev >> CVS was down) and also put a ciabot hook on it. > > What are your experiences with it? > > If the SVN service is stable, we should seriously consider moving xine > over to SVN, which would allow for some badly needed reorganization of > some directory structures. > I converted my SF project (cxx.sf.net) to SVN a couple of weeks ago and was impressed that all the CVS history made it over into the SVN repos. I have not done a lot with it but I did some work over the weekend and its just worked. I also have a project (pysvn.tigris.org) hosted by tigris.org (home of subversion) and the sf.net seemed to be faster then accessing tigris.org. At work we have been using svn for 2 years and I have been using it at home for a bit longer. SVN is very stable and robust. Barry |