From: Thibaut M. <thi...@gm...> - 2004-10-27 08:14:58
|
Hi Miguel, On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:56:15 -0200, Miguel Freitas <mfr...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:46:25 +0200, Thibaut Mattern > <thi...@gm...> wrote: > > It would be cool if someone has time to quickly review the code, the > > testsuite will tell if it's buggy, but a code review can detect crappy > > code or design problems. > > i believe i've fixed some issues, do you want to double check? ok > i'm attaching my changes (some are just casts to avoid loudy compilers, if any). thanks for your fixes, everything looks ok. > is it ok to call it "input_cache" instead of "input_buf"? i'm asking > because i think we have far too many things named "buf" and cache > should be better. i also added a new option "#nocache" that prevents > this plugin from being used. no problem. feel free to commit, i can't do that right now. #nocache is a good idea, it will be easy to test if this plugin improves playback with gnome_vfs or other slow input plugins. > regards, > > Miguel Thibaut |