From: Frantisek D. <va...@us...> - 2003-11-01 13:56:50
|
Hi Miguel, On So, 2003-11-01 at 12:45, Miguel Freitas wrote: > > libffmpeg XvMC support is different from what we implemented for > libmpeg2. the former expect to link the decoder directly to xvmc libs, > which imho, is not a good option (i believe the decoder should not be > dependent on video out stuff like that). > > think about having separated rpm packages for xine plugins: currently, > to enable xvmc one just need to install the vo plugin. otoh the ffmpeg > plugin linked to xvmc would fail to load on a system without these libs. > Yes, it sounds reasonable. I reverted it in CVS. Cheers, Frantisek |