From: <bar...@t-...> - 2002-10-12 06:39:10
|
hi mike, On 10/11, Mike Melanson wrote: > On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Robin KAY wrote: > > > This may sound a little silly but I'm concerned about the state of our > > AUTHORS file. The difference between an active developer and a > > contributor seems to be somewhat arbitrary. I would consider an active > > developer to be someone who has CVS write access and who commits code > > not infrequently and/or maintains a component. Surely, xine has more > > than 6 such people? Any objections to reorganizing the file? I'm afraid > > I have a bee in my bonnet... *sigh* ^_^'. > > Just curious, do I qualify as an active developer yet?...:) definitely :) sorry about beeing so sloppy about the authors file - looks like i completely forgot about it :-/ active developers are those who either work on xine now (with cvs write access) or who worked on xine in the past and are still around, accepting patches / answering emails / ... contributor is anybody who sent in at least one significant patch (>10 lines changed or important bug fixed ... something like that) that made it into cvs. so, feel free to add yourself to the contributors list. you can also add yourself to the webpage ... erm, well, i think you could add yourself to the webpage if it was currently in cvs ;-> ... sorry, the webpage is still in a transitional stage, i think siggi has agreed to maintain it for now. anyway, i think you definitely qualify for the "credits" section and, if you want to participate in that, the sponsoring page - just mail siggi a wishlist :) cheers, guenter -- "Why must you tell me all your secrets when it's hard enough to love you knowing nothing?" -- Lloyd Cole and the Commotions |