From: Andreas L. <no...@sb...> - 2002-01-21 13:18:41
|
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 01:42, Dan Hollis wrote: > On 20 Jan 2002, Andreas Leitner wrote: > > I just tried 0.9.8 with avi->drx3 output using rte instead of fame. This > > rocks. With fame I could always see these huge additional artefacts (at > > least I think thats what they are called), with rte I can no longer see > > a difference. Plus for rte there are debs available so I don't need to > > clutter my system up with a non-packaged library. > > I can't see any difference between fame and rte when they are set to the > same quality level... fame has a quality option and rte doesn't. Are you > sure you had fame set to high quality setting? If it's low then of course > you will see artifacting. I am quite positive that I saw a difference (of course such things are subjective and one can never be 100% sure). My quality was set to 100. Andreas |