Re: [Xdoclet-user] Create() in CMP Missing?

[James H. <ja...@jx...>]

Ah.. This is a case sensitivity issue with the local/local-home generation
failure.. I have 'Local' rather than 'local'. The CVS update seems to work
fine - my code compiles and unit tests pass for my beans.

Thanks for the quick turn around, team!
James

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <di...@bi...>
To: "James Higginbotham" <ja...@jx...>
Cc: <xdo...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Create() in CMP Missing?


> On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, James Higginbotham wrote:
>
> > I just obtained the latest CVS about 10 minutes ago, built it,
> > replaced the jar with the new one, and discovered that none of my
> > ejbCreate() methods are being honored. I just built the samples and
> > noticed the same thing. Anyone else seeing this?
>
> yes... just checked - you're right.  I should apologise... haven't been
> using entity beans recently, so not sure when this happened... perhaps
> someone else can provide some feedback...
>
> > I am also seeing a problem with CMPs that only have a local interface
> > not getting the <local> and <localhome> entries generated in their
> > ejb-jar.xml file. Anyone seeing this as well?
>
> that one looks ok... check out test.ejb.cmr.CityLocal in the
> samples... think of anything that might be setting this off?
>
> > I'm getting a bit frustrated with trying to use this tool, though the
> > goals are honorable. I am concerned that there are no regression tests
> > being performed to ensure that the most basic concepts, such as
> > create() methods, are continuing to be generated. It also prevents
> > quick determination of whether WebLogic and JBoss support is broken or
> > not. Am I missing something with your project, or is this the case? If
> > so, what are the plans for implementing unit tests and other forms of
> > regression testing when introducing new features or bug fixes?
>
> we've talked about testing several times, but its difficult to know where
> to draw the line, and dare I say it, this is possiblity XDoclet's biggest
> weakness (although I'm happy for any of the other developers to argue
> otherwise).  When I develop, I will test that the sample application
> deploys on JBoss... up till recently I've only checked 2.4, but have now
> got it working on 3.0alpha as well.
>
> I think if we had a test suite to run post deploy it would be great, but
> as we all have our own apps that typically have that support, its not in
> the XDoclet cvs... if you were interested in writing something like that
> it would certainly be welcomed with open arms (o:
>
> > Currently, I am spending more time getting around XDoclet 'features'
> > than writing code - I hope this will change, as I don't want to
> > abandon XDoclet unless it is necessary.
>
> bear with us... the create methods should be a quick fix... Ara - looking
> at the template, I can see why they're not there... I'm not going to have
> a look now, but I thought we use to have a "isCreateMethod" tag
> somewhere... will look more tomorrow...
>
> cheers
> dim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> Xdo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
>